attributed to differences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "attributed to differences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the causes or reasons for variations or discrepancies in a particular context. Example: "The discrepancies in the survey results were attributed to differences in the sample populations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The different results might be partially attributed to differences in the construction of tmRNADD derivatives.

Plosone

This could be attributed to differences in the underlying assumptions of the different experimental approaches.

Brain

In previous studies on the disease, the disparity had been attributed to differences in treatment received.

The New York Times - Health

These all could be attributed to differences in style and taste, and quite possibly to geography.

The New York Times - Food

This has been largely attributed to differences in vascular anatomy.

Brain Research

Approximately 14%% of the variation in SGA was attributed to differences between trees within a stand, with only 7%% attributed to differences between sites.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

This was attributed to differences in the degradation mechanisms of polystyrene over solid acids and bases.

Catalysis Today

Differences observed between the BIBRA and Brandeis studies were attributed to differences in the dietary formulations.

Food and Chemical Toxicology

The latter is attributed to differences in the conformations of surfactants within monolayers and micellar assemblies.

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Differences between subclusters were attributed to differences in climate, with some differences profound.

Ecological Modelling

This has been attributed to differences in mechanical and microstructural properties of the two materials.

Engineering Failure Analysis

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "attributed to differences", ensure that the differences being cited are clearly defined and relevant to the context. Provide specific examples to support your claim.

Common error

Avoid using "attributed to differences" as a catch-all explanation without providing specific evidence or analysis of the differences in question. Always identify the key differences that are contributing to the outcome.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "attributed to differences" functions as a causal connector, indicating that variations or disparities are the reason for a particular outcome or observation. Ludwig AI affirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

79%

News & Media

19%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "attributed to differences" serves as a causal connector, explaining that variations are the reason for a specific result. It is grammatically correct and very common, particularly in scientific and news contexts. The most frequent sources are Plosone and The New York Times. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. When using this phrase, ensure that the differences are clearly defined and relevant. Alternatives include "ascribable to variations" and "due to disparities", which offer subtle variations in formality and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ascribable to variations

This alternative is more formal and emphasizes the act of assigning a cause or reason.

due to disparities

This alternative highlights the role of inequalities or imbalances as the cause.

owing to dissimilarities

This phrase is slightly more formal and focuses on the lack of resemblance as the underlying reason.

because of divergences

This alternative emphasizes the act of moving in different directions, leading to variations.

stemming from contrasts

This alternative implies that differences serve as the root or origin of observed effects.

resulting from variations

This alternative focuses on the outcome of variations and their impact.

explained by distinctions

This emphasizes the act of clarifying or making something understandable through differences.

accounted for by diversity

This implies a comprehensive explanation of the differences is possible through diversity.

linked to discrepancies

This suggests a connection between the observed effect and differences.

related to variations

This is a general alternative that simply indicates a relationship between the observed effect and differences.

FAQs

How can I use "attributed to differences" in a sentence?

Use "attributed to differences" to explain why there are variations between two or more things. For example, "The varying success rates can be "attributed to differences" in teaching styles".

What are some alternatives to "attributed to differences"?

You can use alternatives like "due to disparities", "owing to dissimilarities", or "ascribable to variations", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "attributed by differences" instead of "attributed to differences"?

No, the correct phrasing is "attributed to differences". "Attributed by" is used when indicating the agent doing the attributing, not the cause. For example, "The quote is attributed by experts to Plato", whereas, "The outcome is "attributed to differences" in methodology".

What is the difference between "attributed to differences" and "due to differences"?

Both phrases indicate causality, but "attributed to differences" often implies a more formal or analytical assessment of the causes, while "due to differences" is a more general expression of causality.