Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
attention was diverted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "attention was diverted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a situation where someone's focus or concentration has shifted away from something. Example: "During the presentation, attention was diverted by a sudden loud noise outside the window."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
46 human-written examples
And then our attention was diverted elsewhere.
Academia
But his attention was diverted by a movement behind him.
News & Media
Britain backed off only when its attention was diverted by the Boer War in South Africa.
News & Media
John's attention was diverted and his prestige disastrously affected by relations with the papacy.
Encyclopedias
Saints' names replaced girls' names on the tickets, and attention was diverted to divine love.
News & Media
In August, the life seemed to go out of the peace process as the Administration's attention was diverted by Iraq.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
14 human-written examples
Your attention is diverted almost immediately and then diverted again.
News & Media
Then there is a promise -- until your attention is diverted again.
News & Media
Hands-free phone chatting is dangerous as the driver's attention is diverted from the road.
News & Media
But what happens to children when their parents' attention is diverted away from them and is focused on their phones?
The more law-abiding people who are flagged in error, the more attention is diverted from dangerous people.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "attention was diverted" to clearly indicate a shift in focus due to an external influence or a change in priorities. This phrase is effective in both formal and informal contexts.
Common error
While "attention was diverted" is grammatically sound, avoid overusing passive voice. In some cases, active voice can make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "attention was diverted by the noise", consider "the noise diverted attention".
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "attention was diverted" functions as a passive construction, where 'attention' is the subject receiving the action of being diverted. This grammatical structure is used to emphasize where the attention ended up, rather than who or what caused the diversion. Ludwig confirms that this is commonly used.
Frequent in
News & Media
45%
Academia
25%
Encyclopedias
10%
Less common in
Science
10%
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "attention was diverted" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that describes a shift in focus. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is accurate and usable. It is most commonly found in news and media, academic, and encyclopedia sources, with a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, writers should be mindful of the potential for overuse of the passive voice and consider whether an active construction might be more effective. Alternative phrases like "focus was redirected" or "interest was drawn elsewhere" may also be appropriate depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
focus was redirected
Emphasizes a deliberate change in focus.
focus was shifted
Suggests a movement of focus from one thing to another.
mind was turned away
Indicates a mental shift away from something.
interest was drawn elsewhere
Highlights the attraction of interest to a different subject.
thoughts were redirected
Focuses on the change in thought patterns.
priority was changed
Highlights a change in what is most important.
resources were reallocated
Emphasizes the redistribution of resources.
emphasis was moved
Indicates a change in what is emphasized.
energies were channeled elsewhere
Focuses on the redirection of effort and energy.
consideration was given to something else
Suggests a deliberate act of considering a different topic.
FAQs
How can I use "attention was diverted" in a sentence?
You can use "attention was diverted" to describe a situation where someone's focus shifted from one thing to another. For example, "The speaker's "attention was diverted" by a question from the audience".
What are some alternatives to "attention was diverted"?
Alternatives include "focus was redirected", "focus was shifted", or "interest was drawn elsewhere". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "attention was diverted"?
While "attention was diverted" is in the passive voice, using the active voice can sometimes create a more direct and engaging sentence. For example, instead of "attention was diverted by the noise", you could say "the noise diverted attention".
What is the difference between "attention was diverted" and "attention was distracted"?
While both phrases imply a shift in focus, "attention was diverted" suggests a more significant change or redirection, while "attention was distracted" implies a brief or temporary interruption. Consider the strength of the shift when choosing between the two.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested