attacked again

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "attacked again" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where someone or something has been subjected to an attack multiple times. Example: "After the initial incident, the village was attacked again, leaving the residents in fear for their safety."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And then she is attacked again.

The Economist

Around 4 p.m., the militia attacked again.

The New York Times

That night, the bear attacked again.

The New Yorker

The return journey we were attacked again.

The Guardian

Yes, we will be attacked again.

The Guardian - Opinion

Minutes later, the shark attacked again.

The Guardian

But Toronto regrouped and attacked again.

The New York Times - Sports

India attacked again the next day and lost two aircraft.

The Economist

The militants have since attacked again, residents said.

The Guardian

"Do you think New York will be attacked again?" "Yes".

The New York Times

"We attacked again when he was back in the pack".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "attacked again", ensure the context clearly establishes the initial attack. This makes the repetition of the attack more impactful and understandable to the reader.

Common error

Avoid using passive voice excessively when describing who or what "attacked again". Instead, use active voice to make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The city was attacked again by the enemy", write "The enemy attacked the city again".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "attacked again" typically functions as a verb phrase, often used as part of a predicate to describe a recurring action. Ludwig indicates its appropriate use in written English, as shown in multiple examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Wiki

18%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "attacked again" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe a repeated assault, aggression, or hostile action. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is widespread across various domains, particularly in news and media. When using this phrase, consider the initial context of the attack to enhance clarity, and avoid passive voice for more direct and engaging writing. While "attacked again" is generally neutral in tone, you can choose alternative phrases like "assaulted once more" or "subjected to renewed aggression" to adjust the level of formality depending on the specific audience and purpose.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assaulted once more

Replaces "attacked" with "assaulted", implying a physical or violent attack.

targeted repeatedly

Focuses on the intentional selection of a target for multiple attacks.

struck once again

Uses "struck" as a synonym for "attacked", suggesting a forceful impact or blow.

raided anew

Emphasizes a sudden and forceful attack, often for the purpose of plunder or capture.

besieged further

Implies a prolonged and persistent attack, often surrounding a location.

came under fire again

Specifically refers to being attacked with weapons or gunfire.

encountered renewed aggression

Highlights the experience of facing hostility again

faced another offensive

Focuses on facing aggressive military action again.

endured further strikes

Highlights that someone withstood hits once more.

suffered repeated incursions

Focuses on repeated violations.

FAQs

How can I use "attacked again" in a sentence?

You can use "attacked again" to indicate a repeated assault or aggressive action. For example, "After the ceasefire, the village was "attacked again", causing further displacement of residents."

What are some alternatives to "attacked again"?

Alternatives include "assaulted once more", "targeted repeatedly", or "struck once again", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to use "attacked again"? Can it be implied?

While context might sometimes imply a repeated attack, using ""attacked again"" explicitly emphasizes the recurrence and its impact. It's useful when highlighting the persistence or escalation of conflict.

Which is more formal, "attacked again" or an alternative?

"Attacked again" is generally neutral in formality. For more formal contexts, consider "subjected to renewed aggression", while in informal contexts, you might use something like "hit again".