at all damage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "at all damage" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incorrect construction and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The company will not be liable for any damages at all."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Strikingly in agreement with this density-dependent response, the quantity of all HIPV together increased significantly with damage level for CWB-damaged cabbage plants (cv Shikidori), whereas it stayed constant and high at all damage levels for DBM-damaged cabbage plants (cv Shikidori) (Figure 4a, b; Table S4).

Plosone

Clicks, pops and sibilance were removed so long as they "didn't at all damage the integrity of the songs".

The Guardian - Music

However, near-fault aftershocks were prominent at all damage states under severe MS-moderate AS.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

However, near-fault aftershocks were prominent at all damage states under severe MS-moderate AS.   5.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Results confirm that the detrimental effects of liquefaction increase the probability of failure at all damage states.

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

The fragilities also reveal that the steel jacketed bridge exhibits the highest vulnerability compared to CFRP and hybrid repair jackets at all damage states under both earthquake types.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

mi of fruit crop, where damage estimated were at $2.6 million (1987 USD) In all, damage totaled to about $142 million.

Wikipedia

He too voiced disgust at all the damage done, but warned that the rioters had real reasons.

Independent

They have a job to do, they can comment on anybody in a playful way, and I don't think it's at all damaging.

The New Yorker

Thus, while real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) measurements showed that the replication of R. raoultii was similar in both cell lines, (Fig. 5) the L929 monolayer was not at all damaged by R. raoultii (Fig. 6, upper left panel).

Plosone

We've never seen that before, but we're good at plugging things in, so all damage was repaired in time.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the absence of damage, prefer using established phrases such as "no damage at all" or "any damage whatsoever" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "at all damage" directly. It's not grammatically sound. Instead, consider replacing it with a clearer alternative like "no damage at all" or "any damage whatsoever" to express the absence of damage.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "at all damage" is not a standard English construction and doesn't have a clear grammatical function. It appears as part of sentences where the intended meaning involves describing the degree or extent of damage, or, more often, the lack thereof. Ludwig AI confirms this with its analysis.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

40%

Wiki

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "at all damage" appears in some contexts, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that it is not a standard English construction. It's more appropriate to use alternatives such as "no damage at all" or "any damage whatsoever" for clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase is infrequently encountered, primarily in news, scientific, and wiki contexts, but its usage should be approached with caution. Always opt for clearer, more conventional phrasing to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

no damage at all

Directly negates the existence of any damage.

any damage whatsoever

Emphasizes the complete absence of damage of any kind.

no damage whatsoever

Emphasizes the complete and utter lack of damage.

damage of any kind

Highlights that damage, regardless of its nature, is present.

damage of any sort

Similar to "damage of any kind", focusing on the type of damage.

complete absence of damage

Stresses the thorough lack of damage.

total absence of damage

Implies the complete and utter lack of damage.

absence of any damage

Formal way to say damage doesn't exist.

not any damage

Directly states the absence of damage, though less emphatic.

lack of damage

Simply states damage is not present.

FAQs

How can I properly use "at all" with "damage" in a sentence?

It's generally better to restructure your sentence to use established phrases. For example, instead of saying something like "at all damage", opt for "no damage at all" or "any damage whatsoever".

What phrases can replace "at all damage" to indicate a lack of harm?

You can use alternatives like "no damage at all", "any damage whatsoever", or "lack of damage" depending on the context.

Is "at all damage" grammatically correct, and what are better options?

The phrase "at all damage" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Better options include "no damage at all" or "absence of damage".

What is the difference between "at all damage" and "no damage at all"?

"At all damage" is not a standard phrase. "No damage at all" is a grammatically correct phrase used to emphasize that there was absolutely no damage.