at a thickness of

USAGE SUMMARY

"at a thickness of" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you need to describe the thickness of something. For example: "The sheet of plywood was cut at a thickness of 1.6 cm."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Brain sections were cut sagitally at a thickness of 40 μm.

Nature

SC sections were cut horizontally at a thickness of 30 µm.

Nature

The biopsy was snap-frozen, embedded in OCT and sectioned serially at a thickness of 10 μm on a cryostat.

Nature

Sony Ericsson W64S (equipped with a built-in antenna for One-Seg digital TV at a thickness of 14.9mm).

TechCrunch

Kyocera W65K (featuring a wireless music function and a waterproof One-Seg digital TV tuner at a thickness of 15.8mm).

TechCrunch

Blocks were sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin [23].

Nanoscale Research Letters

At a thickness of 5 mm (MIP view) and 1.5-mm (zoom).

Progress in Orthodontics

The Girujan Clay Formation runs through Sitakunda at a thickness of 168 m.

Wikipedia

Slices were cut at a thickness of 350 µm.

Plosone

Tissues were paraffin-embedded and sectioned sagitally using a microtome at a thickness of 5 µm.

Plosone

The brains were sliced using a Vibratome (VT1000S; Leica, Germany) at a thickness of 150 µm.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing technical specifications, always include the unit of measurement (e.g., mm, μm) after specifying the "at a thickness of" value for clarity and precision.

Common error

Ensure you don't omit the unit of measurement when using the phrase "at a thickness of". Omitting the unit (e.g., stating 'at a thickness of 5' instead of 'at a thickness of 5 mm') can lead to misinterpretation and compromise the accuracy of your description.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "at a thickness of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or clause by specifying a particular dimension. It is commonly used to provide precise details about physical objects in technical contexts. Ludwig confirms the validity and frequent use of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

83%

News & Media

9%

Wiki

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "at a thickness of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig, primarily in scientific and technical contexts. It serves the purpose of specifying precise dimensions, and requires the inclusion of measurement units for clarity. The phrase is most commonly found in scientific literature, with less frequent use in news and media. When using this phrase, ensure you include the appropriate units of measurement to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "with a depth of" or "having a width of" can be used depending on the context, as long as the level of precision is retained.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with a depth of

Replaces 'thickness' with 'depth', suitable when the measurement is from top to bottom.

having a width of

Substitutes 'thickness' with 'width', appropriate for side-to-side measurements.

measuring

A more concise way to introduce a dimension without explicitly stating 'at a thickness of'.

in depth

Using the noun 'depth' as a substitute for 'thickness', slightly changes the structure

with a gauge of

Uses 'gauge' in place of thickness, typically in manufacturing and engineering

at a dimension of

Uses 'dimension' to provide an alternative to thickness

having a profile of

Replaces 'thickness' with 'profile', focusing on the shape of the measured object.

in terms of its thickness

More verbose, highlighting 'thickness' as a specific characteristic.

with respect to thickness

Similar to "in terms of its thickness" but with emphasis on the thickness.

the level of thickness

This option changes the order in which we are giving the information.

FAQs

How can I use "at a thickness of" in a sentence?

This phrase is typically used to specify the dimension of an object's width, depth, or layer. For example, you might say, "The coating was applied "at a thickness of" 2 mm".

What are some alternatives to "at a thickness of"?

You can use alternatives like "with a depth of", "having a width of", or simply "measuring", depending on the specific context.

Is it necessary to specify the units of measurement after "at a thickness of"?

Yes, always include the units (e.g., mm, μm, inches) to avoid ambiguity and ensure clear communication. Stating "at a thickness of" 5 mm is much clearer than just saying "at a thickness of" 5.

In what contexts is "at a thickness of" commonly used?

This phrase is frequently used in scientific, technical, and manufacturing contexts where precise measurements are essential. You'll often find it in research papers, engineering specifications, and product descriptions.