assumed for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assumed for" is not commonly used in written English and may not be correct in many contexts.
It could be used when discussing something that is taken for granted or accepted as true for a specific purpose or situation, but it often requires additional context to clarify its meaning. Example: "The values were assumed for the sake of the experiment, allowing us to proceed with the analysis."

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"She assumed, for instance, that everybody had a pony".

The New York Times

Too much pressure, he assumed, for such a menial role.

The New York Times - Sports

Constant dissolved concentrations were assumed for the concrete pore fluid.

Applied Geochemistry

Economies of scale are assumed for the costs.

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Frequently, a value of 1.5 is assumed for α.

Journal of Power Sources

Flattened Gaussian beam (FGB) is assumed for theoretical analysis.

Fusion Engineering and Design

Rigid boundary conditions were assumed for all models.

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

The same is assumed for working women.

Johns Hopkins University

Scientists have assumed for years that nanotubes were insoluble.

Forbes

Statistical significance is assumed for P < 0.05.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Another one is assumed for sugarcane.

AMB Express

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "assumed for", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being taken for granted and why. This is especially important in technical writing where precision is key.

Common error

Avoid using "assumed for" without clearly specifying what is being assumed. Ambiguity can lead to misinterpretations, especially in scientific or technical contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assumed for" functions as a predicate complement, specifying a condition or context under which something is taken as true or valid. It is frequently used to introduce a premise upon which further reasoning or analysis is based, as seen in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "assumed for" is frequently encountered in scientific and formal contexts, where it serves to introduce a premise taken as true for a specific analysis or purpose. While Ludwig AI identifies it as acceptable, it is crucial to use it with clarity to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "presumed for" or "taken for granted for" to ensure precision. The phrase's prevalence in scientific literature highlights its importance in reasoned arguments and systematic analyses. The frequency of "assumed for" makes it a common element in technical writing, requiring careful attention to contextual appropriateness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

presumed for

Replaces "assumed" with "presumed", offering a slightly more formal tone while maintaining the core meaning.

taken for granted for

Emphasizes that something is accepted without question, adding a layer of obviousness to the assumption.

supposed for

Indicates a belief or expectation, often without concrete evidence, similar to "assumed".

considered for

Highlights the act of regarding something in a specific way for a particular purpose.

posited for

Suggests a formal or academic setting where something is put forward as a basis for reasoning.

stipulated for

Implies a condition or requirement that has been agreed upon or specified.

hypothesized for

Refers to something being proposed as a hypothesis to be tested.

deemed for

Indicates a judgment or assessment that something is suitable for a specific purpose.

construed for

Focuses on the way something is interpreted or understood in a certain context.

understood for

Highlights the common knowledge or shared understanding of something in a particular situation.

FAQs

How can I use "assumed for" in a sentence?

The phrase "assumed for" is often used to indicate a premise or condition that is taken as true for a particular analysis or situation. For example, "A normal distribution was "assumed for" the error terms in the model."

What are some alternatives to "assumed for"?

Alternatives to "assumed for" include phrases like "presumed for", "taken for granted for", or "supposed for", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it always necessary to explicitly state what is "assumed for" a particular analysis?

While not always strictly necessary, explicitly stating the assumptions is good practice, especially in formal writing. This ensures clarity and prevents misunderstandings. If it's obvious from the context, it may be implied, but explicitness is generally preferred.

What's the difference between ""assumed for"" and "assumed to be"?

"Assumed for" typically introduces the context or purpose for which an assumption is made. "Assumed to be" directly states the assumption itself. For example, "Statistical significance was "assumed for" p < 0.05" versus "The data was assumed to be normally distributed."