assistant of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assistant of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to someone who provides assistance to a particular person or organization. For example, "He was the assistant of the mayor."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

YTC was a research assistant of ED-SSS in charge of the data analysis and project administrative assistance.

BMC Public Health

You are the assistant of the boss.

The New Yorker

One of the maids relieved the assistant of Noi's handbag.

The New Yorker

Named Joe Jones special assistant of baseball operations.

The New York Times - Sports

Jerry Gorovoy, her assistant of twenty years, confirms this.

The New Yorker

He was the assistant of a thousand faces.

The New York Times - Sports

Recently, the personal assistant of a famous actor called me.

The New York Times

In 1998, Perkins hired an assistant of her own.

The New Yorker

Born in 1780, he was a blazingly apt pupil and assistant of Jacques-Louis David.

The New Yorker

Catherine Mareska, his assistant of thirty-five years, has a long-suffering look.

The New Yorker

Mr. Sorkin also hired Margaret Judson, an assistant of Mr. Olbermann's, to act on "The Newsroom".

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "assistant of" to clearly define a supportive role or association between individuals or entities, ensuring the context highlights the nature of the assistance provided.

Common error

Avoid using "assistant of" when the relationship is collaborative and lacks a clear hierarchical structure; "associate of" or "collaborator with" may be more accurate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assistant of" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a noun, specifying the individual or entity that the assistant supports. Ludwig examples showcase its use in various contexts, providing clarity on the relationship between the assistant and their superior or the area of their assistance.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

29%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "assistant of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase to define the role of an assistant in relation to a specific person, entity, or area. Ludwig's examples confirm its prevalence across diverse contexts, including news, science, and professional settings. The phrase generally maintains a neutral register, leaning towards formality in business or academic environments. While Ludwig AI confirms it's a correct and usable construction, be aware of situations that might require more nuanced alternatives like "aide to" or "associate of" to accurately reflect the nature of the relationship.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

aide to

Focuses on providing help or support, slightly more personal and direct.

helper of

Emphasizes the act of aiding or helping someone in their tasks.

associate of

Indicates a professional or collaborative relationship, less hierarchical.

deputy to

Signifies a role of secondary authority or support.

right-hand person of

Implies a close and trusted assistant.

adjunct to

Highlights a supplementary or subordinate role.

collaborator with

Suggests a cooperative working relationship.

subordinate to

Indicates a position of lower rank or authority.

underling of

A more informal term for someone in a subservient position.

second in command to

Designates someone who takes over when the primary leader is absent.

FAQs

How do I properly use "assistant of" in a sentence?

Use "assistant of" to specify the person or entity being supported. For example, "She is the "assistant of" the director."

What's a good alternative to "assistant of" that conveys a similar meaning?

Consider using phrases like "aide to", "associate of", or "deputy to", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "assistant to" instead of "assistant of"?

While both can be acceptable, "assistant of" is generally used when specifying the entity or area one assists, while "assistant to" is used for assisting a person directly.

What's the difference between saying "assistant of" and "assistant at"?

"Assistant of" typically refers to assisting a person or entity directly, while "assistant at" implies assistance within a specific location or organization. For instance, "assistant of the manager" vs "assistant at the store".