assessed objectively

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assessed objectively" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evaluations or judgments that are made without personal bias or subjective influence. Example: "The project's success will be assessed objectively based on measurable outcomes and performance metrics."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Why does Danny Sullivan say that index size cannot be assessed objectively?

The New York Times

That impact is assessed objectively, with electronic monitoring, and subjectively, using patient reports.

The New Yorker

Could the effect of typography on the perception of truth be assessed objectively?

The New York Times

The quality of each study was assessed objectively.

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Postural control was assessed objectively using forceplates and subjectively through perceived stability ratings.

Safety Science

Neighborhood compactness was assessed objectively using geographic information systems via a subsequent grant (2008 12).

Preventive Medicine

Neurosensory disturbance of the IAN was assessed objectively using the modified SW perception test reported by Semmes and Weinstein.

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

Sedentary time, assessed objectively, ranged from 522 to 643 min/day: higher than in adults without intellectual disabilities.

Preventive Medicine

Outcome measures: Primary outcomes were walking activity (assessed objectively with an activity monitor) and parent-reported physical activity (Activity Questionnaire for Adults and Adolescents).

Journal of Physiotherapy

The methodology is applied to a selection of real-life organisations and their current capabilities in terms of digital investigation are assessed objectively using the DI-CMM.

Digital Investigation

Objective: To determine whether endometrial echogenicity, assessed objectively by a computer-assisted system on the day of hCG administration, predicts endometrial receptivity in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles for IVF-ET.

Fertility and Sterility

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "assessed objectively", specify the methods or criteria used to ensure transparency and credibility. For example: "The candidate's performance was assessed objectively using a standardized rubric and performance data."

Common error

Avoid claiming that something is "assessed objectively" without providing supporting evidence or clear criteria. Objectivity is strengthened when you describe the specific, measurable aspects used in the assessment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assessed objectively" typically functions as an adverbial modifier, describing how an evaluation or measurement is conducted. It indicates that the assessment is performed without bias, using measurable and verifiable criteria. Ludwig provides numerous examples across various domains, reinforcing its adverbial role.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

23%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "assessed objectively" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe evaluations conducted without bias, relying on measurable criteria. Ludwig's examples highlight its frequent use in scientific and news media contexts. When using this phrase, it's crucial to specify the methods and criteria employed to support the claim of objectivity. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and widely applicable, ensuring clear and credible communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

objectively evaluated

Inverts the order of words, emphasizing the evaluation process itself but maintains the core meaning.

evaluated without bias

Highlights the absence of prejudice in the assessment process, focusing on fairness.

impartially judged

Similar to "evaluated without bias" but uses "judged" to emphasize the act of forming an opinion or conclusion.

measured quantitatively

Focuses on the use of numerical data and metrics to conduct the assessment, implying objectivity through measurable results.

assessed using verifiable metrics

Emphasizes that the metrics employed can be verified, adding a layer of reliability to the assessment.

examined empirically

Highlights the use of evidence and observation in the evaluation process, common in scientific contexts.

determined by factual analysis

Focuses on the use of factual information rather than subjective opinions to conduct the assessment.

evaluated based on established criteria

Implies the existence of pre-defined standards, ensuring consistent and fair evaluation.

judged by standardized methods

Highlights the use of repeatable methodologies for evaluation, ensuring objectivity and consistency.

evaluated through rigorous testing

Emphasizes the thoroughness and strictness of the evaluation process, suggesting a high degree of objectivity.

FAQs

How can I use "assessed objectively" in a sentence?

You can use "assessed objectively" to describe evaluations that are based on measurable criteria and free from personal bias. For instance, "The student's progress was "assessed objectively" using standardized test scores."

What are some alternatives to "assessed objectively"?

Alternatives include "evaluated without bias", "impartially judged", or "measured quantitatively". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

What does it mean for something to be "assessed objectively"?

When something is ""assessed objectively"", it means it's evaluated based on factual evidence and measurable data, rather than personal feelings, interpretations, or biases. It implies a fair and unbiased evaluation process.

Is it always possible to ensure that something is "assessed objectively"?

While striving for complete objectivity is ideal, it can be challenging in some situations. However, using standardized criteria, multiple evaluators, and transparent processes can help minimize bias and make the assessment as objective as possible.