assessed for errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assessed for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of evaluating something, such as a document or a system, to identify any mistakes or issues. Example: "Before submission, the report was thoroughly assessed for errors to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Major outliers and unduly influential cases were assessed for errors and/or reasons for their differentiation.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

Medication orders written during observed prescribing tasks will be assessed for errors after the observational session.

BMJ Open

For the purpose of the study, the hospital was divided into the following areas The out patients department (OPD) Accident and Emergency (A&E) Day case centres (including day-case theatres and laser rooms) In patient ward From this latter group only discharge summaries were assessed for errors.

BMC Ophthalmology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

CPCdeJ, RBM and PCW abstracted the medical records and assessed for error.

Critical Care

The first 20 questionnaires from each province that were entered by the data-entry clerk were re-entered by one author (JH) in their entirety to assess for errors.

BMC Public Health

Twice a month, the CHAP-EMS data will be reviewed and analysed to assess for errors in data entry, and assure fidelity to the planned intervention (eg, monitor referral patterns by EMS personnel and proper use of the screening tools).

BMJ Open

Hence the simplicity of defining a neutral joint position for each of the involved joints in the exercise and categorizing the deviation in "some deviation" and "substantial deviation" to either side in a single plane is a viable and inexpensive solution when assessing for errors during exercise.

BioMed Research International

The applicability of the developed criteria was also assessed for interobserver error.

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

If there was no prescription writing error identified then the script was assessed for drug related errors and these were defined as:- Incorrect drug dose or timing Incorrect route of administration.

BMC Ophthalmology

Once a prescription writing error was identified, the script was not further assessed for drug related errors.

BMC Ophthalmology

Data collected by the data collector in the community will be assessed for completion and errors at the field level by the collectors.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "assessed for errors", specify the type of errors being assessed to provide context and clarity to your writing. For example, "The data was assessed for transcription errors".

Common error

Avoid using "assessed for errors" without defining what constitutes an error in the given context. Without clear criteria, the assessment becomes subjective and less reliable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assessed for errors" functions as a passive construction indicating that something is being evaluated to find mistakes. According to Ludwig, the phrase is usable in written English. It primarily appears in scientific contexts, as seen in the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "assessed for errors" is grammatically correct and primarily used in scientific and academic contexts to describe the process of evaluating something for mistakes or inaccuracies. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's usability and correctness. While alternatives like "evaluated for inaccuracies" or "checked for mistakes" exist, "assessed for errors" maintains a formal tone suitable for research and technical documentation. It's important to specify the type of errors being assessed to provide clarity and avoid vagueness. Despite its correct usage, the relatively low frequency suggests that more descriptive alternatives might be preferred in some contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evaluated for inaccuracies

Replaces "errors" with "inaccuracies"; maintains the same meaning but with a slightly different nuance.

checked for mistakes

Uses more informal terms "checked" and "mistakes" instead of "assessed" and "errors".

reviewed for faults

Substitutes "assessed" with "reviewed" and "errors" with "faults", keeping a similar formal tone.

examined for defects

Replaces "assessed" with "examined" and "errors" with "defects", implying a more thorough investigation.

audited for discrepancies

Uses "audited" instead of "assessed" and "discrepancies" instead of "errors", suggesting a formal review process.

inspected for flaws

Employs "inspected" instead of "assessed" and "flaws" instead of "errors", indicating a close visual examination.

screened for inaccuracies

Replaces "assessed" with "screened" and "errors" with "inaccuracies", suggesting a filtering process.

investigated for irregularities

Substitutes "assessed" with "investigated" and "errors" with "irregularities", implying a more in-depth analysis.

validated for correctness

Replaces "assessed for errors" with a phrase focused on confirming accuracy rather than finding errors.

verified for accuracy

Similar to "validated for correctness", this alternative focuses on confirming the absence of errors.

FAQs

How can I use "assessed for errors" in a sentence?

You can use "assessed for errors" to describe the process of evaluating something for mistakes, such as: "The document was "assessed for errors" before submission."

What are some alternatives to "assessed for errors"?

Some alternatives include "evaluated for inaccuracies", "checked for mistakes", or "reviewed for faults", depending on the context and the level of formality required.

Is it better to say "assessed for errors" or "assessed for accuracy"?

While both phrases are valid, "assessed for errors" focuses on identifying mistakes, while "assessed for accuracy" implies a broader evaluation of correctness. The choice depends on whether you're specifically looking for errors or evaluating overall accuracy.

What does it mean to be "assessed for errors" in data entry?

When data entry is "assessed for errors", it means the entered data is being reviewed and verified to identify any mistakes, such as typos, incorrect values, or omissions, ensuring the integrity of the dataset.