assay was validated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "assay was validated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in scientific or technical contexts to indicate that a particular assay has been tested and confirmed to be reliable and accurate. Example: "The results of the study were significant, and the assay was validated to ensure the accuracy of the findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The ranibizumab assay was validated, while the bevacizumab and aflibercept assays were fully qualified.

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Each ChIP assay was validated by qPCR against an IgG control and enrichment above input.

Nature

The assay was validated with 512 vaginal specimens from pregnant women.

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

The assay was validated using calcium phosphate cement and PMMA as biomaterials.

Biomaterials

The assay was validated and compared to the performance of a plaque assay.

Biologicals

For all compounds, the assay was validated with accuracies within ±13% and precisions less than 15%.

Journal of Chromatography B

The assay was validated by comparison with other established CCR5 assays.

Virology

The assay was validated by using oseltamivir carboxylate as a reference inhibitor.

Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry

The assay was validated in a 5 5000 ng/ml calibration range.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

In addition, this assay was validated by testing clinical samples and isolates.

Molecular and Cellular Probes

The assay was validated by testing serial dilutions of the WHO international HBV DNA standard.

Journal of Virological Methods

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing assay validation, specify the parameters used for validation, such as accuracy, precision, and specificity, to provide a clear understanding of the assay's reliability.

Common error

Avoid stating that the "assay was validated" without providing specifics on the scope and limitations of the validation process. Always specify the conditions under which the assay was validated and the potential impact of variations from these conditions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "assay was validated" typically functions as a declarative statement in scientific or technical writing. It indicates that a particular assay has undergone a process to confirm its reliability and accuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "assay was validated" is a common and grammatically correct expression used in scientific and technical contexts. It signifies that a specific assay has been thoroughly tested and confirmed to be reliable and accurate. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of the phrase. Predominantly found in scientific literature, this phrase informs the reader of the assay's adherence to required performance standards. Related phrases include "assay was verified" and "assay was confirmed". Best practices involve specifying validation parameters, while common errors include overgeneralizing validation results. Ensuring clarity and providing specific details about the validation process enhances the credibility and understanding of research findings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assay was verified

Replaces 'validated' with 'verified', emphasizing confirmation of accuracy.

assay was confirmed

Substitutes 'validated' with 'confirmed', highlighting the corroboration of the assay's results.

assay was substantiated

Uses 'substantiated' instead of 'validated', focusing on the support of the assay by evidence.

assay was corroborated

Replaces 'validated' with 'corroborated', indicating that the assay's findings were supported by additional evidence.

assay was authenticated

Substitutes 'validated' with 'authenticated', emphasizing the establishment of the assay's genuineness.

assay underwent validation

Changes the structure to focus on the process of validation rather than the state.

validation of the assay

Transforms the sentence to a noun phrase, emphasizing the validation itself.

assay's validity was established

Focuses on the establishment of validity, altering the sentence structure.

the assay's accuracy was verified

Shifts the focus to the accuracy aspect of the assay, using 'verified' for confirmation.

assay's reliability was confirmed

Emphasizes the reliability of the assay, using 'confirmed' for assurance.

FAQs

What does it mean when an assay is validated?

When an assay is validated, it means that the accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of the assay have been rigorously tested and confirmed according to established standards and guidelines. Validation ensures that the assay provides consistent and trustworthy results.

Why is it important that an "assay was validated"?

It is important that an "assay was validated" because validation ensures the reliability and accuracy of the results. This is crucial for making informed decisions in research, diagnostics, and other fields where the assay is used. Without validation, the results may be questionable or unreliable.

What are some alternatives to saying "assay was validated"?

You can use alternatives such as "assay was verified", "assay was confirmed", or "assay underwent validation" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

What parameters are typically assessed when an "assay was validated"?

Typical parameters assessed during assay validation include specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, linearity, range, and robustness. These parameters ensure that the assay performs consistently and reliably under different conditions.