as reviewed by

USAGE SUMMARY

“as reviewed by” is an appropriate phrase to use in written English.
You could use it to acknowledge someone who has reviewed or critiqued a particular piece of work. For example: "The article was favorably received as reviewed by the expert panel."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

However, the information on yield gains by available GM traits as reviewed by Graef et al.

Biomass and Bioenergy

The discussion about their function lasted until the first quarter of the 20th century as reviewed by Boothby in 1921.

Clinical interventions in aging

A straight talking guide to navigating puberty as a teenage girl, as reviewed by a Guardian children's books site teen reviewer.

The Guardian

Even below par, as reviewed by Brian Logan in 2010, he peddles some of the "furthest-out and funniest idiocy in town".

The Guardian

Norman Birnbaum Washington, D.C. Applebaum's book, at least as reviewed by Menand, buys into the nationalist conservatism typical of the current leaders of the former Eastern bloc.

The New Yorker

Applebaum's book, at least as reviewed by Menand, buys into the nationalist conservatism typical of the current leaders of the former Eastern bloc.

The New Yorker

Many applications are reported, as reviewed by Fuzery et al. [8].

Clinical and Translational Medicine

Consultant 31/57, Registrar 11, 2 FICE trainee (1 documented as reviewed by FICE approved Consultant).

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

However, core-hydroxylated metabolites were not reported, as reviewed by (Dalhoff and Bergan (1998)).

AMB Express

In fact, the R/L may vary with site condition, as reviewed by Bonnefoy-Claudet et al. (2006b).

Earth, Planets and Space

Core circadian clock genes as reviewed by Kelleher FC, Rao A, Maguire A. Circadian molecular clocks and cancer.

EJNMMI Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "as reviewed by", ensure that you accurately represent the reviewer's findings or opinions. Use direct quotes or paraphrases with appropriate citations to maintain academic integrity.

Common error

Avoid misrepresenting the reviewer's actual findings or opinions when using the phrase "as reviewed by". Always double-check your interpretation and provide sufficient context to avoid misleading readers.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as reviewed by" functions as a prepositional phrase that introduces a source or authority whose evaluation or analysis is being referenced. This serves to attribute information, opinions, or findings to a specific reviewer, enhancing the credibility of the statement. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate and commonly used in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "as reviewed by" is a versatile phrase employed to attribute information, opinions, or findings to a reviewer, especially in academic and professional contexts. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. It is most frequently found in scientific and news-related domains and serves the crucial purpose of lending credibility and authority to statements by citing reputable sources. When using "as reviewed by", ensure that you accurately represent the reviewer's assessment and provide appropriate citations to maintain academic integrity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

according to

This alternative is more direct and indicates simple agreement with the source.

based on the review of

This phrase emphasizes that something is derived or influenced by the review.

as stated by

Focuses on the declaration or assertion made by the reviewer.

in the opinion of

Highlights that the following information is a personal judgment of the reviewer.

the reviewer noted that

This alternative directly points out a specific observation made by the reviewer.

it was reviewed by

This emphasizes the action of reviewing rather than the person who reviewed.

the analysis made by

Focuses specifically on the analytical work done by the reviewer.

the evaluation from

Highlights the evaluative aspect of the review process.

following the assessment of

Indicates a sequential dependency on the reviewer's assessment.

drawing from the insights of

Emphasizes using ideas and understandings provided by the reviewer.

FAQs

How can I use "as reviewed by" in a sentence?

You can use "as reviewed by" to introduce information or opinions that come from a review. For example, "The study's methodology, "as reviewed by" Smith, showed significant limitations".

What's a more formal alternative to "as reviewed by"?

A more formal alternative could be "according to the assessment of" or "based on the analysis of". These phrases provide a similar meaning but are better suited for academic or professional contexts.

Is it necessary to cite the source when using "as reviewed by"?

Yes, it is essential to cite the source when using "as reviewed by" to give credit to the reviewer and allow readers to verify the information. Proper citation enhances the credibility of your work.

What is the difference between "as reviewed by" and "according to"?

"As reviewed by" specifically indicates that the information comes from a review process, while "according to" is a broader term that simply attributes the information to a source, regardless of whether it was a review.