Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as rejected by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as rejected by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was dismissed or not accepted by a particular person or group. Example: "The proposal was not implemented, as rejected by the board during the last meeting."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
"Perceives himself as rejected by others," his current psychological assessment says.
News & Media
Back then, Gordon Brown's intervention in the case of a state school pupil with 5 As rejected by Oxford ushered in a golden era of government policy to widen participation in higher education.
News & Media
Clarke's remarks came after recent research from a Labour-linked thinktank Sera concluded 60% of all unsuccessful applications to build wind turbines were turned down by Conservative councils – twice as many as rejected by Labour councils.
News & Media
I classified stolen wires as rejected by test males, though including them did not alter the results.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
Ideas are accepted and sorted on their merits, with as many ideas rejected by peers as are accepted.
News & Media
Aden, and Yemen as a country, are still emerging from decades as outcasts, rejected by the West for links to the Soviet Union, and in the last decade Iraq, as well as for the country's history of harboring Islamic terrorist groups.
News & Media
I profile him as "likely rejected by my co-op board".
News & Media
Today, American soldiers live and die on MREs, otherwise known as Meals Rejected by Everyone, Meals Rarely Edible, Meals Rejected by the Enemy or Materials Resembling Edibles.
News & Media
The justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke, was watching as peers rejected, by a majority of 37, his proposals to restrict legal support for victims of domestic violence.
News & Media
They are the successors of soggy canned C-rations and the unheatable meals that troops in the Persian Gulf war scorned as "Meal, Rejected by Everyone".
News & Media
(Tim Hetherington, the photojournalist who was killed in Libya in April, recalled his experience in Afghanistan with the dehydrated food packets called MREs: "Meals, Ready-to-Eat, otherwise known as Meals Rejected by Everyone, Meals Rarely Edible.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "as rejected by" to clearly indicate the entity or person responsible for the rejection, providing context and accountability in your writing.
Common error
Avoid using "as rejected by" without clearly specifying who or what is doing the rejecting, as this can lead to confusion and misinterpretation of the information.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as rejected by" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or clause, indicating the agent responsible for the rejection. As Ludwig points out, it's a correct and usable phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Science
30%
Wiki
20%
Less common in
Formal & Business
10%
Encyclopedias
5%
Academia
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "as rejected by" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate the entity responsible for a rejection. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is suitable for various writing contexts, though its frequency is relatively uncommon. The phrase is most often found in News & Media and Scientific articles. When using "as rejected by", ensure that the source of the rejection is clearly specified to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
dismissed by
Focuses on the act of disregarding or considering something unworthy of attention.
turned down by
Emphasizes the act of refusing an offer or request.
refused by
Highlights a direct denial or unwillingness to accept something.
declined by
Suggests a polite or formal refusal.
vetoed by
Implies an authoritative rejection, often by someone in a position of power.
repudiated by
Indicates a strong and formal disavowal or rejection.
disapproved of by
Focuses on expressing a negative opinion or lack of support.
not accepted by
A more general way of saying that something was not agreed to or received favorably.
deemed unacceptable by
Suggests a judgment that something does not meet required standards.
spurned by
Implies a rejection with disdain or contempt.
FAQs
How can I use "as rejected by" in a sentence?
Use "as rejected by" to show that something was turned down or not accepted. For example, "The proposal was not implemented, as rejected by the board during the last meeting."
What can I say instead of "as rejected by"?
You can use alternatives like "dismissed by", "turned down by", or "refused by" depending on the context.
Is it more formal to say "dismissed by" or "as rejected by"?
"Dismissed by" is slightly more straightforward, while "as rejected by" can add a touch of formality, but both are suitable for professional contexts.
What's the difference between "as rejected by" and "vetoed by"?
"Vetoed by" implies a rejection from someone in a position of authority, whereas "as rejected by" is more general and can apply to any entity that does the rejecting.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested