Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as previously excluded
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as previously excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer back to something that was mentioned earlier in a text or discussion that has been left out or not included. Example: "The data set will include all relevant information, as previously excluded, to ensure comprehensive analysis."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
These tended to boost presidential power, and also tried to ensure that previously excluded groups (such as indigenous people) were better represented.What is needed now are measures to strengthen parties and to reform their financing to reduce corruption and influence-peddling.
News & Media
For reference values, 20 of 24 pregnant, nondiabetic, non-PE women (DM−) were also studied (3 were previously excluded as described [ 16]; 1 additional exclusion due to sample attrition).
Science
Erdoğan's "Turkish war of independence" was the (real and imagined) inclusion of those previously excluded from Kemalist mainstream Turkey, as well as the enormous economic growth of the last decade.
News & Media
Democracy, as he defines it, grants sovereignty to the citizens of the nation and flourishes as larger numbers of persons, previously excluded (what the eighteenth century called "the many")—"secure the power not simply to select their governors, but to oversee the institutions of government, as officeholders and as citizens free to assemble and criticize those in office" (p. xix).
Academia
In the face of globally integrating markets, this is an attempt by Europe's leaders to both raise the continent's economic growth and make this growth more inclusive by bringing into the economic mainstream many previously excluded groups such as younger people, women, and immigrants.
Academia
Interestingly, this peptide maps to an AHNAK domain that was previously excluded to serve as a substrate for CAPN3 [17] and deviates from the motif only at position 9 where it contains a proline instead of [LIMV].
Science
While city authorities might be ignoring poorer parts of the city, private companies such as Google are stepping in to map previously excluded parts of Rio de Janeiro.
News & Media
The new policy will include conditions such as bipolar disorder and alcohol and drug abuse, which were previously excluded.
News & Media
This ban will cause a rise in premiums as insurers are forced to cover conditions that they had previously excluded.
News & Media
It's about bringing in players who felt previously excluded.
News & Media
Overton described a method for moving that window, thereby including previously excluded ideas, while excluding previously acceptable ideas.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "as previously excluded", ensure that the context clearly establishes what was excluded and why. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "as previously excluded" without explicitly stating what was excluded and the reasons for its exclusion. This can lead to confusion and weaken the impact of your statement.
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
3.9/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as previously excluded" functions as an adverbial modifier, specifying the circumstances under which something was not included or considered. It modifies a clause by indicating a prior state of exclusion. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, although it's not a frequently used expression.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Reference
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "as previously excluded" serves as an adverbial modifier indicating a prior state of exclusion. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness, although its usage is infrequent. It's best suited for formal contexts where precision is important, such as scientific or technical writing. Alternatives include "formerly omitted" and "previously not included". When using the phrase, ensure you clearly reference what was excluded to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
previously not included
This variant emphasizes that something was not part of a prior set or group.
previously omitted
Focuses specifically on the act of leaving something out before.
formerly omitted
This alternative highlights the act of leaving something out in the past.
previously left out
Emphasizes the action of omitting something from a former consideration.
earlier disregarded
This phrase points out the act of having dismissed something at an earlier time.
formerly not considered
Highlights that something was not taken into account at an earlier stage.
previously unconsidered
This suggests something hadn't been thought about before.
initially set aside
Indicates that something was put to the side at the beginning.
originally discounted
This emphasizes the act of having dismissed something from an earlier calculation or thought.
initially disregarded
Highlights the act of ignoring something from the start.
FAQs
How can I use "as previously excluded" in a sentence?
You can use "as previously excluded" to refer to something that was deliberately left out or not considered before. For instance, "The analysis includes data from all participants, "as previously excluded", to provide a comprehensive overview."
What are some alternatives to "as previously excluded"?
Some alternatives include "formerly omitted", "previously omitted", or "previously not included", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to say "as previously excluded" or "previously excluded"?
Both "as previously excluded" and "previously excluded" are grammatically correct, but they serve slightly different purposes. "As previously excluded" introduces a clause, linking the current statement to a prior exclusion, whereas "previously excluded" is a simple descriptor. The choice depends on the sentence structure and emphasis you intend.
What's the difference between "as previously excluded" and "as previously mentioned"?
"As previously excluded" indicates that something was deliberately left out, while "as previously mentioned" simply refers back to something that was stated earlier. The key difference lies in the act of exclusion versus mere reference. For example "The following list shows the accepted requests, "as previously mentioned", to provide a comprehensive overview."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
78%
Authority and reliability
3.9/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested