Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as included in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as included in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to something that is part of a larger document, list, or context. Example: "The terms of the agreement are as included in the attached document."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Academia
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Only IgM and IgG class antibodies against cardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein-1 (as included in the ACR-97 criteria) were analysed, whereas analysis of IgA (as included in the SLICC-12 criteria) was not performed.
Unlike unadjusted Kaplan Meier curves, the adjusted survival curves take potential effects of covariates into account as included in the multivariate Cox models [ 25].
Science
The word "sole" is omitted as included in "exclusive".
Academia
The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities".
Academia
This comes in three versions; the "full" one with variable manipulation functions (as included in "USGDSTD"), the "lite" one which lacks these (as included in "USGDLITE"), and the "nozs" one which also lacks ZShell program support (as included in "USGDNOZS").
In subsection (a)(1), the words "or naval" are omitted as included in "military".
Academia
In subsection (d), the word "contumacy" is omitted as included in "refuses or fails".
Academia
L. 105 178 and to be treated as included in Pub.
Academia
parameters as included in this collection of files is more accurate.
Academia
In subsection (a)(1), the word "make" is omitted as included in "adopt".
Academia
In subsection (b), the word "rules" is omitted as included in "regulations".
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "as included in" to clearly indicate that a specific element or detail is part of a larger set or document, thus avoiding ambiguity and enhancing the reader's understanding.
Common error
Avoid using "as included in" when a more precise verb like "specified", "defined", or "detailed" would provide greater clarity and impact.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as included in" functions as a prepositional phrase, acting as an adjectival modifier. It specifies the location or context from which something originates or is found. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English for referencing elements within larger documents or lists.
Frequent in
Science
34%
Academia
27%
News & Media
18%
Less common in
Formal & Business
8%
Wiki
7%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the prepositional phrase "as included in" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to reference content contained within a larger context. Used across diverse fields like science, academia, and news, it ensures clarity and credibility by pinpointing the source of information. Ludwig AI affirms its proper usage, emphasizing its role in specifying locations or contexts. For enhanced writing, aim for precision by clarifying the reference and considering stronger verbs when more specificity is needed. By understanding its function and register, you can effectively incorporate "as included in" into your writing while maintaining clarity and academic integrity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
as specified in
Focuses on the act of specifying something within a document or set of instructions, rather than just including it.
as detailed in
Emphasizes that something is described with a high level of detail within a particular source.
as outlined in
Highlights that something is presented in a structured or schematic form within a document.
as contained in
Directly indicates that something is physically or conceptually held within something else.
as defined in
Specifically refers to a definition that is provided within a certain context.
as stipulated in
Implies that something is required or agreed upon within a formal agreement or contract.
as per
A shorter, more concise way to indicate that something is done according to a specific source or instruction.
according to
Indicates something is in agreement or conformity with.
in accordance with
Indicates compliance with a set of rules, standards or guidelines.
falling under
Suggests categorization or being a subset of something larger.
FAQs
How can I use "as included in" in a sentence?
Use "as included in" to specify that a particular detail or element is part of a larger source or document. For example, "The data is valid as included in Appendix A".
What are some alternatives to "as included in"?
You can use alternatives like "as specified in", "as detailed in", or "according to" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "as included in" or "as stated in"?
"As included in" suggests something is part of a larger set or document, while "as stated in" simply means something is mentioned. Choose the phrase that best reflects the relationship you're describing.
What's the difference between "as included in" and "as defined in"?
"As included in" indicates presence within a source, whereas "as defined in" refers specifically to a formal definition provided in a source. If you're referring to a formal definition, use "as defined in"; otherwise, "as included in" may be more appropriate.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested