as described with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as described with" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used when referring to something that has been explained or detailed in a specific manner, but it is better to use a more conventional phrasing. Example: "The procedure should be followed as described with the accompanying documentation."

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Assays were performed essentially as described, with minor modifications [ 56].

Biology Direct

ChIP was performed essentially as described with minor adaptations (Kim and Rossi 2009).

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Chromosomal DNA was digested with SmaI and prepared and analyzed as described with minor modifications (23).

Emerging Infectious Diseases

The virus was isolated from tissues collected as described with some modifications [ 8, 30].

BMC Veterinary Research

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as described with some modifications10,67.

Nature

Isolation and culture of miR-155ko/+ and miR-155ko/ko cells was performed as described with minor modification.

Nature

A low-density infection is as described, with no reference to the diagnostic being used to try and detect it.

Nature

The method was performed as described with modifications [64].

Natural Products and Bioprospecting

DPPH radical-scavenging activity was determined as described with slight modification.

Botanical Studies

Calcein staining was performed as described with minor modifications [16].

Plosone

ChIP assays were performed as described with minor changes [64].

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "as described with", ensure that the specific modifications are clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. If there are no modifications, consider using "as described" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "as described with" repeatedly in close proximity within the same text. Vary your phrasing by using alternatives like "as detailed in" or "following the method in" to improve readability and avoid sounding monotonous.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as described with" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb by indicating the manner in which an action is performed. Ludwig indicates that the phrase is acceptable but not necessarily grammatically ideal.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "as described with" is frequently used, particularly in scientific and academic writing, to indicate that a procedure is being followed with certain modifications. While Ludwig indicates it is acceptable, it may not be the most grammatically sound choice for every context. Alternatives like "as detailed in" or "following the method outlined in" might offer greater clarity and precision. The key is to ensure that any modifications are clearly specified. Predominantly found in scientific literature, its formality is high, reflecting the technical nature of its usage. By considering these nuances, writers can make informed decisions about when and how to use this phrase effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as detailed with

Replaces "described" with "detailed", suggesting a more thorough explanation is being referenced.

as specified with

Substitutes "described" with "specified", implying a more precise set of instructions are being followed.

as outlined with

Replaces "described" with "outlined", indicating the reference is to a summarized version of the procedure.

as per instructions with

Uses a more direct approach indicating action is being taken "as per instructions".

according to the method with

Provides a more formal tone by stating action "according to the method".

following the protocol with

This alternative focuses on adhering to an established "protocol".

in compliance with the guidelines with

Highlights adherence to "guidelines", emphasizing regulatory or best-practice standards.

in line with the specifications with

Indicates alignment with "specifications", useful when precision is key.

consistent with the approach with

Focuses on the "consistency" of the method used, suggesting uniformity.

pursuant to the procedure with

Offers a formal and legalistic tone, indicating action is being taken "pursuant to" an official procedure.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "as described with" for better clarity?

For improved clarity, consider alternatives such as "as detailed in", "as specified in", or "following the method outlined in". These options provide more precise and unambiguous communication.

Is "as described with" grammatically correct?

While commonly used, especially in scientific writing, some consider "as described with" less grammatically sound than alternatives like "as described in". It's important to consider your audience and the desired level of formality.

What's the difference between "as described with" and "as described in"?

"As described with" typically introduces specific modifications or additions, whereas "as described in" generally refers to following a previously detailed procedure without significant changes. Therefore, use "as described in" when you're referring to a method in its entirety and without significant deviation.

When should I use "as described with" versus "as described"?

Use "as described with" when you are making modifications or additions to a previously detailed method or procedure. If you are following the method exactly as it was previously detailed, use the simpler phrase "as described".