Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
article was funded by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "article was funded by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the source of financial support for the research or publication of an article. Example: "The article was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Reporting for this article was funded by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
News & Media
Research for this article was funded by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
News & Media
The reporting for this article was funded by the Pulitzer Centre on Crisis Reporting.
News & Media
The reporting for this article was funded by a grant from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
News & Media
Travel for this article was funded by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting Follow the Long Read on Twitter at @gdnlongread, or sign up to the long read weekly email here.
News & Media
Publication of this article was funded by GOFC-GOLD.
This article was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71202148 and 71702184).
Publication of this article was funded by the Injury Free Coalition for Kids®.
Science
Publication of this article was funded by the Società Italiana di Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SIOT).
Publication of this article was funded by the University of Colorado Boulder Libraries Open Access Fund.
The study was conducted with no external funding, although publication of this article was funded by the Injury Free Coalition for Kids®.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Acknowledge all funding sources, even if they seem minor. This helps maintain transparency and ethical standards in research and reporting.
Common error
Avoid vague statements like "The article was funded by a private donor." Instead, provide specific names or organizations to ensure clarity and credibility.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "article was funded by" functions as a declarative statement identifying the source of financial support for an article. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable expression in written English. It employs the passive voice, emphasizing the article as the recipient of the funding.
Frequent in
Science
56%
News & Media
42%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "article was funded by" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate the source of financial support for a publication. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. Predominantly found in scientific and news media contexts, this phrase serves to enhance transparency and credibility. When using this phrase, it's best practice to provide specific details about the funding source and acknowledge all contributions, avoiding vague generalizations. Alternatives include "article received funding from" and "funding for the article was provided by", offering nuanced ways to convey the same information.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
article received funding from
Replaces the passive voice with a more direct statement about funding source.
funding for the article was provided by
Emphasizes the provision of funds using a different passive construction.
the article's research was supported by
Focuses on the support given to the research aspect of the article.
this article benefited from funding by
Highlights the positive impact of the funding on the article.
the article acknowledges financial support from
Emphasizes acknowledgment of support, suitable for formal contexts.
this publication was made possible by funding from
Indicates that the funding was crucial for the article's publication.
the article is a result of funding from
Connects the article directly to the funding source as a consequence.
article's expenses were covered by
Highlights the financial coverage provided for the article's production.
financial backing for the article came from
Uses a more informal term "backing" to describe the financial support.
the article reports funding from
Focuses on the act of reporting the source of funding.
FAQs
How do I properly acknowledge that "article was funded by" a specific grant?
You should include the full name of the granting organization and the grant number. For example: "This "article was funded by" the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant DK58845."
What's the difference between saying "article was funded by" and "article was supported by"?
While both indicate financial assistance, ""article was funded by"" typically refers to direct monetary contributions. "article was supported by" can also include in-kind contributions like resources, equipment, or personnel.
Is it necessary to disclose that the "article was funded by" a commercial entity?
Yes, disclosing commercial funding is crucial for transparency and helps readers assess potential conflicts of interest. Always clearly state if the "article was funded by" a company.
Can I use the phrase "article was sponsored by" instead of "article was funded by"?
While similar, "article was sponsored by" often implies a marketing or promotional relationship in addition to financial support. If the primary relationship is financial, ""article was funded by"" is generally more accurate.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested