Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

argued for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"argued for" is a perfectly acceptable phrase that can be used in written English.
For example, you could say: "The professor argued for an increase in funding for the research project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Other officials have argued for better regulation.

News & Media

The Guardian

Golkar's detractors have argued for this.

News & Media

The Economist

Mr. Cameron had argued for a freeze.

News & Media

The New York Times

It argued for far wider intelligence sharing.

News & Media

The New York Times

I have long argued for a referendum.

News & Media

Independent

I've long argued for such shifts.

News & Media

The New York Times

It will be argued for yrs.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Minow argued for a different approach.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

We argued for half an hour.

News & Media

The Guardian

Jurgen had even argued for it.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Several authors have since argued for reciprocity in IME.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "argued for" when you want to convey that someone has presented reasons or evidence in support of a particular idea, policy, or action. It indicates a reasoned and persuasive approach.

Common error

Ensure you clearly state what the subject "argued for". Vague statements like "He argued for it" lack impact. Instead, specify: "He argued for stricter environmental regulations."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "argued for" is as a phrasal verb, where 'argued' serves as the verb and 'for' functions as a preposition that modifies the verb's meaning. This construction indicates the act of presenting reasons or evidence in support of a particular idea or cause. Ludwig confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Academia

22%

Science

19%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "argued for" is a versatile phrasal verb used to express support for a particular idea or action by presenting reasons or evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is grammatically correct and commonly found in various contexts, especially in news, academic, and scientific domains. When using the term, ensure you clearly state what is being advocated for to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "advocated" or "supported" can be used for conciseness. By understanding its grammatical function, communicative purpose, and register, you can effectively use "argued for" in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "argued for" in a sentence?

Use "argued for" when you want to indicate that someone presented reasons or evidence in support of something. For instance, "The lawyer "argued for" the defendant's release on bail."

What are some alternatives to "argued for"?

Some alternatives include "advocated", "supported", or "made a case for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "argued for" formal or informal?

"Argued for" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Its appropriateness depends more on the surrounding vocabulary and sentence structure than on the phrase itself.

What's the difference between "argued for" and "argued against"?

"Argued for" indicates support or advocacy for something, while "argued against" indicates opposition or disagreement with something. They are antonyms.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: