argue to the contrary

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "argue to the contrary" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when presenting a counterargument or opposing viewpoint in a discussion or debate. Example: "While many believe that climate change is a natural cycle, some scientists argue to the contrary, emphasizing human impact on the environment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

There are those who would argue to the contrary.

The Guardian

"But very few lawyers could argue to the contrary once the decision had been made".

The New Yorker

America has become ungovernable.In our cover leader (and in a related audio discussion) we argue to the contrary.

The Economist

In fact, in attempting to argue to the contrary, Rawls has scored an own goal by showing that if anything, GCRs are currently amplifying a solar cooling effect.

The Guardian

As much as the club's fans would argue to the contrary, the fault does not completely lie with Benitez for everything that has gone awry at Stamford Bridge.

Independent

(David Murray will no doubt argue to the contrary and the merits of this will be dealt with in due course in the appropriate forum).

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

I would argue to the contrary--that thoughtful people appreciate opposing arguments on innumerable topics that involve nuanced questions about the very complicated world we live in.

Huffington Post

"Simple common sense argues to the contrary," the tribunal ruled.

The Guardian - Tech

The show surrounding his dramatically uncalled-for flowers argues to the contrary.

The New Yorker

Ms. Fay argues to the contrary: "Scholarship on Shostakovich is still in its infancy.

The New York Times

Spokesmen for the Pentagon have assured us that no damage to the ocean environment will take place, but many civilian scientists have argued to the contrary.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "argue to the contrary", ensure the context clearly establishes the original viewpoint being challenged. This provides clarity and strengthens the counter-argument.

Common error

While grammatically sound, "argue to the contrary" can sound overly formal in casual conversation. Opt for simpler phrases like "disagree" or "think otherwise" in informal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "argue to the contrary" functions as a discourse marker, specifically used to signal the presentation of an opposing viewpoint or counterargument. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase introduces statements that challenge previously mentioned ideas or beliefs.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "argue to the contrary" is a grammatically correct phrase used to introduce opposing arguments. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and appropriateness in various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias. While effective, it's more suitable for formal writing and should be used judiciously in casual conversations. Related phrases include "contend otherwise" and "assert the opposite". Remember to clearly establish the initial viewpoint before presenting a counter-argument using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

argue against that

A more straightforward way of expressing disagreement, focusing on arguing against a specific point.

dispute this assertion

Directly challenges a previous statement or claim. It focuses on disputing an assertion.

counter this argument

Presents a rebuttal or opposing argument. It focuses on countering an argument.

contend otherwise

A more concise way to express the act of arguing to the opposite point of view. It focuses on the act of contending.

take issue with this

Expresses disagreement or objection to a specific point. It focuses on taking issue.

assert the opposite

Emphasizes a strong declaration of an opposing viewpoint. It focuses on the act of asserting.

object to this view

Indicates a formal or strong disagreement with a particular viewpoint. It focuses on objecting to a view.

maintain the reverse

Suggests a sustained or consistent argument for the contrary position. It focuses on consistency and maintaining an idea.

claim the inverse

Implies a direct and opposing claim, often in a logical or mathematical context. It focuses on an inversed claim.

posit an alternative

Presents a different possibility or explanation. It focuses on introducing an alternative.

FAQs

How can I use "argue to the contrary" in a sentence?

Use "argue to the contrary" to introduce a contrasting opinion or evidence. For example, "While many believe that remote work boosts productivity, studies "argue to the contrary", citing increased distractions".

What are some alternatives to "argue to the contrary"?

Alternatives include "contend otherwise", "assert the opposite", or "dispute this assertion". The best choice depends on the specific context and the level of formality required.

Is it better to say "argue to the contrary" or "argue against that"?

"Argue to the contrary" is more formal and often used in academic or professional writing. "Argue against that" is simpler and more suitable for informal contexts.

What's the difference between "argue to the contrary" and "claim the inverse"?

"Argue to the contrary" is a general phrase for presenting an opposing viewpoint. "Claim the inverse" implies a direct and opposite claim, often in a logical or mathematical sense.