argue for the opposite

USAGE SUMMARY

"argue for the opposite" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It typically means to argue in favor of the opposite viewpoint or opinion. Example: In the essay, the author presents a strong argument for the benefits of social media, but I will now argue for the opposite and highlight its negative effects on mental health.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Debtors will argue for low home values while lenders will argue for the opposite, to minimize their losses.

The New York Times

QUESTION FROM LARRY: In light of your comment on Congress not being able to control the court, I wonder what you think of Barry Friedman's book — which seems to argue for the opposite conclusion (over the long run).

The New Yorker

But the American system also guarantees the rights of those who argue for the opposite view: that Islam is basically a peaceful, universalist faith which restricts rather than enjoins the use of violence.This does not mean that America has a monopoly of wisdom in distinguishing peaceful Muslim citizens from the other sort.

The Economist

However, other scholars argue for the opposite, claiming that 'stereotype accuracy is one of the largest and most replicable findings in social psychology' (Jussim et al. 2015).

Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

The Irish were arguing for the opposite.

The Guardian

Yet in every respect, he is arguing for the opposite.

The Guardian

But the invigorating effect of her exhibition argues for the opposite of retirement.

The New York Times - Arts

Actually, it argues for the opposite, since imagination can fill in details that memory can't.

The New York Times - Books

One might reply, of course, by arguing for the opposite conclusion.

SEP

His 1998 book Unweaving the Rainbow considers John Keats's accusation that by explaining the rainbow, Isaac Newton diminished its beauty; Dawkins argues for the opposite conclusion.

Wikipedia

Oregon blitzes U.C.L.A. one week, and all the pundits argue for the Ducks opposite Alabama in the national title game.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "argue for the opposite", ensure the context clearly establishes the original position being countered. This provides clarity and strengthens the impact of your argument.

Common error

Avoid creating a straw man by misrepresenting the opposing viewpoint. Accurately portray the original argument before you "argue for the opposite" to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "argue for the opposite" functions as a verb phrase used to indicate a disagreement or a contrasting viewpoint to a previously stated claim or idea. It often introduces a counter-argument or alternative perspective. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "argue for the opposite" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used to introduce a counter-argument or alternative perspective. As Ludwig AI confirms, it adheres to standard English grammar and is commonly found across various contexts, including news media, scientific publications, and general discourse. While generally neutral in register, its effective use relies on clearly establishing the original position and accurately representing the opposing viewpoint. When looking for alternative phrases, remember that "dispute the point", "contradict the argument", and "present a counter-argument" can be considered.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

present a counter-argument

Emphasizes the presentation of an opposing argument.

contradict the argument

Emphasizes a direct contradiction of a given argument.

oppose the proposition

Directly indicates opposition to a specific proposal or statement.

counter the claim

Highlights the act of opposing a specific claim or statement.

dispute the point

Focuses on directly challenging a specific point or assertion.

advocate an opposing view

Stresses the active support of a different perspective.

defend an alternative stance

Highlights the defense of a different viewpoint or position.

maintain the contrary position

Highlights holding a position that is in direct opposition.

challenge the premise

Focuses on questioning the underlying basis of an argument.

take issue with

Indicates disagreement or objection to something.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "argue for the opposite" in a debate?

To effectively "argue for the opposite", start by acknowledging the original claim, then present evidence and reasoning that supports the contrary viewpoint. Use credible sources and logical arguments to strengthen your position.

What's a less formal way to say "argue for the opposite"?

Informally, you could say "take the other side", "play devil's advocate", or "dispute the point", which are all alternatives to "argue for the opposite" depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to explicitly state that you "argue for the opposite"?

No, it's not always necessary. The context and the strength of your counter-arguments may implicitly convey your opposing stance. However, explicitly stating your intention can provide clarity.

What is the difference between "argue against" and "argue for the opposite"?

"Argue against" implies directly opposing a specific point, while "argue for the opposite" suggests advocating for an entirely different viewpoint. For example, you might "argue against" a specific policy but "argue for the opposite", a completely different policy.