Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are worked with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are worked with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the process of collaborating or interacting with someone or something in a professional or practical context. Example: "The engineers are worked with by the project managers to ensure that all specifications are met."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Thus, it is essential how requirements are worked with during systems engineering and how they influence the development of the tangible and intangible parts of the solution.

The new chip is made by observing how human cells are worked with in medicine.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Sharpcast's synchronization technology, the company says though, is set to change the way more than just photos are worked with.

News & Media

TechCrunch

The domes and vaults of the sandstone buildings are worked with tracery of incised painting to create elaborate geometric forms.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

They are working with operators.

They are working with gold.

They are working with us in Haiti.

News & Media

The New York Times

"We are working with the University".

News & Media

Independent

We are working with business.

"We are working with them.

News & Media

The Guardian

Several family members are working with him.

News & Media

Forbes
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "are worked with", ensure that the context clearly indicates who or what is performing the action. Clarity is key due to the passive construction.

Common error

Avoid relying too heavily on passive constructions like "are worked with". Opt for active voice when possible to make your writing more direct and engaging. Instead of saying "the data are worked with by the analysts", consider "the analysts work with the data".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are worked with" primarily functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject is receiving the action rather than performing it. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which confirms its grammatical correctness. Examples in Ludwig illustrate its use in describing processes where something undergoes manipulation or treatment.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

32%

Wiki

31%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are worked with" is a grammatically correct passive voice construction, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While its frequency is rare, it appears in diverse contexts, including science, news, and wiki articles. It effectively describes a process where something is being acted upon, though active voice alternatives often provide a more direct and engaging tone. When using "are worked with", ensure clarity and consider whether an active voice construction would be more suitable for your intended message.

FAQs

How can I use "are worked with" in a sentence?

You can use "are worked with" to describe a process where something is being acted upon, for example: "The requirements "are worked with" during systems engineering to influence development."

What phrases are similar to "are worked with"?

Similar phrases include "are collaborated with", "are handled by", or "are processed by", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing how something is used?

While passive voice like "are worked with" is grammatically correct, active voice often creates a more direct and engaging sentence. For example, "analysts work with the data" is more direct than "the data "are worked with" by analysts".

What is the difference between "are worked with" and "are collaborating with"?

"Are worked with" implies that something is being acted upon, whereas "are collaborating with" implies a mutual participation in a task. The difference lies in who is performing the action vs. who is involved in the action.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: