Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are worked with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are worked with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the process of collaborating or interacting with someone or something in a professional or practical context. Example: "The engineers are worked with by the project managers to ensure that all specifications are met."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
Thus, it is essential how requirements are worked with during systems engineering and how they influence the development of the tangible and intangible parts of the solution.
Science
The new chip is made by observing how human cells are worked with in medicine.
News & Media
Sharpcast's synchronization technology, the company says though, is set to change the way more than just photos are worked with.
News & Media
The domes and vaults of the sandstone buildings are worked with tracery of incised painting to create elaborate geometric forms.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
They are working with operators.
News & Media
They are working with gold.
News & Media
They are working with us in Haiti.
News & Media
"We are working with the University".
News & Media
We are working with business.
News & Media
"We are working with them.
News & Media
Several family members are working with him.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "are worked with", ensure that the context clearly indicates who or what is performing the action. Clarity is key due to the passive construction.
Common error
Avoid relying too heavily on passive constructions like "are worked with". Opt for active voice when possible to make your writing more direct and engaging. Instead of saying "the data are worked with by the analysts", consider "the analysts work with the data".
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are worked with" primarily functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject is receiving the action rather than performing it. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which confirms its grammatical correctness. Examples in Ludwig illustrate its use in describing processes where something undergoes manipulation or treatment.
Frequent in
News & Media
37%
Science
32%
Wiki
31%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "are worked with" is a grammatically correct passive voice construction, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While its frequency is rare, it appears in diverse contexts, including science, news, and wiki articles. It effectively describes a process where something is being acted upon, though active voice alternatives often provide a more direct and engaging tone. When using "are worked with", ensure clarity and consider whether an active voice construction would be more suitable for your intended message.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are collaborated with
Emphasizes a cooperative effort, focusing on the joint nature of the work. This alternative is more active and direct.
are engaged with
Suggests an active involvement or interaction, implying a mutual participation. More active and implies interaction.
are handled by
Highlights the management and execution of tasks, emphasizing the agent performing the work rather than the object being worked on.
are dealt with by
Indicates how someone manages or resolves a situation, problem, or task. Indicates the problem-solving approach.
are processed by
Focuses on a systematic and often automated series of actions applied to something. It is more applicable when something is transformed.
are utilized by
Highlights the practical application of something, emphasizing its use. More about the use than the process.
are treated with
Specifies a method or substance applied for a particular purpose, often in a medical or chemical context. Implies a specific application or interaction.
are operated on by
Implies some mechanical or surgical action is being performed on something.
are employed with
Suggests using something in conjunction with something else, often to achieve a goal. This is more about co-employment.
are manipulated by
Highlights the skillfull handling, or perhaps even deceitful control, of something by someone. Manipulation element is evident.
FAQs
How can I use "are worked with" in a sentence?
You can use "are worked with" to describe a process where something is being acted upon, for example: "The requirements "are worked with" during systems engineering to influence development."
What phrases are similar to "are worked with"?
Similar phrases include "are collaborated with", "are handled by", or "are processed by", depending on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing how something is used?
While passive voice like "are worked with" is grammatically correct, active voice often creates a more direct and engaging sentence. For example, "analysts work with the data" is more direct than "the data "are worked with" by analysts".
What is the difference between "are worked with" and "are collaborating with"?
"Are worked with" implies that something is being acted upon, whereas "are collaborating with" implies a mutual participation in a task. The difference lies in who is performing the action vs. who is involved in the action.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested