are weighed against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are weighed against" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used when comparing two or more factors, considerations, or options to evaluate their relative importance or impact. Example: "The benefits of the new policy are weighed against its potential drawbacks before making a final decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

Analyst estimates are weighed against a company's earnings over time.

The New York Times

The design and off-design performances are weighed against in three different solar chimney plant sizes.

Renewable Energy

It's striking that security and foreign-policy interests are weighed against "policy considerations".

The New Yorker

The study findings are weighed against what is observable out in the world.

The New York Times - Science

The estimated economic benefits of sustainable wetland management are weighed against the costs of alternative wetland management scenarios.

Ecological Economics

Using three case studies, we discuss how the personal responsibilities of citizens are weighed against the responsibilities of local authorities.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

The risks were weighed against new realities.

The New York Times

Costs must be weighed against patient outcomes, however.

The New York Times

This should be weighed against the benefits of shareholder activism.

The New York Times

Those fees should be weighed against the tax savings.

The New York Times

Another is that risks have to be weighed against benefits.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are weighed against", ensure that both sides of the comparison are clearly defined to provide a balanced and comprehensive assessment.

Common error

Avoid using "are weighed against" without explicitly stating what factors are being compared. Providing context enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are weighed against" functions as a passive construction indicating comparison and evaluation. It signifies that certain factors, considerations, or options are being assessed for their relative importance or impact, as Ludwig AI confirms.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

32%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are weighed against" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It functions as a passive construction used for comparing and evaluating different factors. Its register is neutral to formal, making it suitable for diverse contexts like science, news, business, and academia. The examples demonstrate its widespread use in analytical assessments, where competing elements are carefully considered. High-quality sources consistently employ this phrase, underscoring its reliability and appropriateness in formal writing. Remember to provide clear context for what is being compared when using "are weighed against" to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are balanced against

Focuses on equilibrium and equal consideration, emphasizing a balanced comparison.

are compared with

Highlights the act of comparing, often to find similarities and differences.

are measured against

Suggests a quantifiable comparison, using a standard or benchmark for evaluation.

are assessed against

Emphasizes a more formal evaluation or judgment against a specific criterion.

are evaluated in relation to

Highlights the relational aspect of the evaluation, showing how they connect.

are juxtaposed with

Focuses on placing items side by side to highlight differences or contrasts.

are considered alongside

Implies a simultaneous consideration of multiple factors.

are set against

Suggests a contrasting or opposing relationship between elements.

are contrasted with

Highlights the distinct differences between the compared elements.

are judged in light of

Focuses on making a judgment considering specific information or context.

FAQs

How to use "are weighed against" in a sentence?

Use "are weighed against" to compare two or more factors, considerations, or options to evaluate their relative importance. For example, "The benefits of the new policy "are weighed against" its potential drawbacks."

What can I say instead of "are weighed against"?

You can use alternatives like "are balanced against", "are compared with", or "are measured against" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "are weighed against" or "are weighed against each other"?

"Are weighed against" is generally preferred because it's more concise. "Are weighed against each other" can be used for emphasis, but is often redundant.

What's the difference between "are weighed against" and "are considered alongside"?

"Are weighed against" implies a more direct comparison and evaluation, while "are considered alongside" suggests a more simultaneous and equal consideration of multiple factors without necessarily prioritizing one over the other.