are valid

USAGE SUMMARY

"are valid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing whether a point, decision, or opinion is correct. For example, "The safety protocols we discussed at the meeting are valid."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There are valid criticisms.

The New York Times

These suspicions are valid".

The New York Times

All are valid explanations.

The New York Times

Those marriages are valid.

The New York Times

These concerns are valid.

The New York Times

These are valid criticisms.

The Guardian

Both are valid".

The New York Times - Magazine

Both views are valid.

The Guardian - Sport

Both reasons are valid.

The New York Times

His points are valid.

The Washington Post

All of them are valid.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are valid", ensure the context clearly establishes what the claims, arguments, or reasons are valid for. Specificity enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "are valid" without providing sufficient context or evidence. Simply stating something is valid without justification weakens the statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are valid" functions as a predicate adjective, attributing the quality of validity to a subject. Ludwig examples confirm its use in assessing the soundness of arguments, claims, and concerns.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

23%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are valid" is a versatile and commonly used predicate adjective that indicates the justification, correctness, or relevance of a subject. Analysis of Ludwig's examples reveals its frequent application across News & Media, Science, and Wiki contexts, with a generally neutral to professional tone. When employing this phrase, ensure sufficient context is provided to support the assertion of validity. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase adheres to standard grammatical rules, solidifying its role as a reliable component of effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are legitimate

Highlights the acceptance and authorization of the claims or reasons.

are well-founded

Focuses on the existence of substantial evidence supporting their validity.

are justified

Emphasizes the reason or basis for the validity, suggesting a strong rationale.

are relevant

Highlights the connection and importance of the points to the matter at hand.

are sound

Implies a robust and reliable foundation for the validity.

are defensible

Suggests that the points can be supported against opposition or challenge.

are correct

Suggests accuracy and absence of error in the statements.

hold true

Focuses on the truth aspect, implying the statements withstand scrutiny.

are acceptable

Highlights that the statements align with expectations and standards.

are applicable

Focuses on the relevance and suitability of the reasons in a particular situation.

FAQs

How can I use "are valid" in a sentence?

You can use "are valid" to indicate that certain arguments, points, or claims are justifiable or well-founded. For instance, "The concerns about the new policy "are valid" given the potential impact on employee morale".

What's the difference between "are valid" and "are justified"?

While both phrases suggest something is acceptable, "are valid" focuses on the logical soundness or factual accuracy, whereas "are justified" emphasizes the presence of sufficient reasons or moral rightness. You might say "The concerns "are valid" based on the data", but "The actions "are justified" by the circumstances".

What can I say instead of "are valid"?

Alternatives include phrases like "are legitimate", "are sound", or "hold true", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it always necessary to provide evidence when stating that something "are valid"?

While not always explicitly required, providing evidence or reasoning to support the claim that something "are valid" strengthens your argument and enhances credibility. Strong arguments usually give strong basis.