Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are tested with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are tested with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process or method in which something is evaluated or examined using specific tools or criteria. Example: "The new software features are tested with various user scenarios to ensure functionality and performance."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Many shows are tested with children before they are broadcast.
News & Media
Seniors are tested with a surprise basket of drink ingredients they have to use to create their own cocktails.
News & Media
Controllers are tested with different wind profile.
These concepts are tested with three systems.
Science
Teflon and glass shields are tested with and without slit.
All samples are tested with a universal testing machine.
Aluminium and copper shields are tested with and without slit.
The algorithms are tested with IEEE and TNEB benchmark systems.
The calculated errors are tested with simulated and experimental results.
Science
As previously stated, all YouTube videos are tested with the same fixed resolution (640×360).
This means that when different mines are tested with each other models, the paths are similar.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are tested with", ensure the object being tested is clearly defined, as well as the tools, methods, or conditions used for testing. This improves clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid overusing the passive voice when using "are tested with". While grammatically correct, excessive passive voice can make your writing sound vague or less engaging. Consider rephrasing to use an active voice where appropriate to improve clarity and impact.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are tested with" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that something is undergoing a process of evaluation or examination using specific tools or methods. As Ludwig AI notes, it's a common construction in various fields.
Frequent in
Science
79%
News & Media
12%
Formal & Business
9%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are tested with" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to describe the process of evaluation or examination. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in diverse writing scenarios. Predominantly found in scientific and technical contexts, it conveys a sense of factual assessment. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying both the object being tested and the tools or methods employed. While overuse of passive voice should be avoided for more engaging writing, the phrase remains valuable for describing methodologies in a clear, concise manner. Related phrases, such as "are evaluated using" and "are assessed with", offer alternative ways to express similar concepts.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are evaluated using
Replaces "tested" with "evaluated", suggesting a more formal or comprehensive assessment.
are assessed with
Substitutes "tested" with "assessed", implying a judgment or appraisal is being made.
are examined with
Replaces "tested" with "examined", suggesting a closer, more detailed inspection.
are subjected to
Conveys that the subject undergoes a process, emphasizing the imposition of a test or condition.
are analyzed using
Focuses on a detailed study of something through specific tools or methods.
are experimented on with
Highlights the experimental nature of the process, often used in scientific contexts.
are validated against
Suggests that something is being checked for accuracy or correctness against a standard.
are verified with
Implies a confirmation of truth or accuracy through the use of specific methods or tools.
are trialed with
Emphasizes the use of trials or experiments to assess something, particularly in research or development.
are put through
Indicates a rigorous process of testing or assessment, often implying difficulty or challenge.
FAQs
How can I use "are tested with" in a sentence?
You can use "are tested with" to describe the process of evaluating something using specific tools or criteria. For example, "The new software features "are tested with" various user scenarios to ensure functionality and performance."
What can I say instead of "are tested with"?
You can use alternatives like "are evaluated using", "are assessed with", or "are examined with" depending on the context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "are tested with"?
While "are tested with" is grammatically correct in the passive voice, using the active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The materials "are tested with" pressure", you could say "Engineers test the materials with pressure."
What is the difference between "are tested with" and "are tested on"?
"Are tested with" typically refers to the tools or methods used in testing, while "are tested on" usually refers to the subject or entity being tested. For example, "The samples "are tested with" a new device", versus "The new drug "are tested with" animals before human trials."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested