are substantiated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are substantiated with" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to express that something is confirmed, supported, or backed up with evidence or other facts. For example, "The claims made in the report are substantiated with numerous examples."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

These principles are substantiated with a series of examples.

University of California, Berkeley

Finally, the analytical design are substantiated with numerical results.

Neurocomputing

The theoretical results are substantiated with numerical examples.

Applied Mathematics and Computation

The test results are substantiated with numerical parametric analysis.

Journal of Constructional Steel Research

The results obtained from these analytical techniques are substantiated with the results of TG-DTA.

Construction and Building Materials

All developments are substantiated with several numerical tests, namely FSI-benchmarks, including appropriate extensions, and a flapping membrane example.

Journal of Computational Physics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Neither, however, has so far been substantiated with proof.

Britannica

Theoretical assessment is substantiated with the help of experiments.

International Journal of Fatigue

The proposed framework is substantiated with several numerical tests.

Journal of Computational Physics

Everything depends on how well each of those arguments can be substantiated with specific evidence.

The New York Times

These mechanisms have been substantiated with scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

Electrochimica Acta

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are substantiated with", ensure that the evidence or supporting information is clearly and directly relevant to the claim being made. Vague or indirect support weakens the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "are substantiated with" when the evidence is preliminary or inconclusive. This phrase implies a strong level of support that may not be warranted, potentially misleading the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are substantiated with" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a claim, theory, or result is being supported or confirmed by specific evidence or data. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a grammatically sound expression. Examples in Ludwig showcase its use in academic and scientific writing.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

70%

Academia

10%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are substantiated with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to indicate that a claim is supported by evidence, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It's most frequently found in scientific and academic contexts, conveying formality and precision. To use it effectively, ensure the supporting evidence is relevant and avoid overstating the strength of the support. Consider alternatives such as "are supported by" or "are confirmed by" for subtle differences in emphasis. The phrase is a valuable tool for establishing credibility in writing, particularly in formal and academic settings. Be mindful that other contexts are less common.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are supported by

Focuses on the idea of having backing or reinforcement, suggesting a broad base of support.

are confirmed by

Emphasizes the validation or verification of something through evidence.

are validated by

Highlights the act of proving something's accuracy or correctness.

are proven by

Indicates that something has been definitively demonstrated as true.

are verified with

Suggests a process of checking or authenticating information.

are demonstrated by

Focuses on showing or illustrating something clearly through evidence.

are underpinned by

Implies a strong foundation or basis of support.

are backed up by

Indicates that something is reinforced or supported by additional evidence.

are corroborated by

Highlights independent confirmation of information from multiple sources.

are authenticated with

Suggests that something has been officially recognized or proven as genuine.

FAQs

How can I use "are substantiated with" in a sentence?

Use "are substantiated with" to indicate that claims or findings are supported by evidence. For example, "The report's conclusions are substantiated with data from multiple studies."

What are some alternatives to saying "are substantiated with"?

You can use alternatives like "are supported by", "are confirmed by", or "are validated by" to convey similar meanings.

Is there a difference between "are substantiated with" and "are supported by"?

"Are substantiated with" emphasizes that claims have concrete evidence, while "are supported by" can imply broader backing, not necessarily limited to specific evidence.

When is it appropriate to use "are substantiated with" in writing?

It is appropriate to use "are substantiated with" when you want to highlight that a statement is firmly backed by solid, verifiable evidence, lending credibility to your argument.