are substantially insufficient

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are substantially insufficient" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where something is significantly lacking or inadequate in quantity or quality. Example: "The resources provided for the project are substantially insufficient to meet the deadlines we have set."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

This finding clearly showed that DNMT3A2 and DNMT3L are insufficient for establishment of methylation imprints and imprinted loci are substantially resistant to DNMTs in ng oocytes.

Human Molecular Genetics

Revenues are substantially growing.

Forbes

Moreover, the decrease in information need was substantially larger than on insufficient knowledge.

Clinical Rheumatology

Still, the Chinese currency is "substantially undervalued" and its appreciation "is insufficient and more progress is needed," the report noted.

The New York Times

However, the system was substantially less informative due to an insufficient number of candidate genes, a lack of cross-links between the different types of the information, and inefficient user interfaces for the retrieval system.

BMC Systems Biology

Waisel wrote to the court: "In light of the insufficient dose of midazolam, it is substantially likely that McGuire [is at] substantial, palpable, objectively intolerable risk of experiencing the agony and horrifying sensation of unrelenting air hunger.

The Guardian

Energy delivery was substantially reduced by avoiding RF delivery in areas with insufficient tissue electrode contact.

Europace

The alternative hypothesis of homotachy is substantially, but not strongly supported, and the method may simply have insufficient power to detect heterotachy in this data set.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

This was substantially true.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Now, it is substantially unchanged.

The New York Times

244 was substantially revised.

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are substantially insufficient", ensure that the context clearly indicates what specific need or requirement is not being met. This helps to avoid ambiguity and strengthens the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "are substantially insufficient" when a milder term like "inadequate" would suffice. The phrase implies a significant and noticeable deficiency, so ensure the context warrants such a strong assertion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are substantially insufficient" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state of something as being significantly inadequate. This phrase often appears in sentences where a critical evaluation of resources, efforts, or qualities is made, according to Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are substantially insufficient" is a grammatically correct construct used to express a significant lack or inadequacy. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides example usage. While examples of its use are currently absent, the phrase commonly appears in formal and professional contexts such as science, academia, and business. Alternatives like "are significantly inadequate" or "are markedly deficient" can be used for similar effect, depending on the specific nuance desired. When employing this phrase, be mindful of overstating the degree of insufficiency and ensure the context warrants such a strong declaration.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are significantly inadequate

Emphasizes the inadequacy to a significant degree, using "significantly" instead of "substantially".

are markedly deficient

Highlights the deficiency using "markedly", indicating a noticeable and considerable lack.

are considerably lacking

Focuses on the aspect of lacking, replacing "insufficient" with "lacking" and "substantially" with "considerably".

are seriously wanting

Uses "wanting" to denote a lack and "seriously" to emphasize the severity of the insufficiency.

are grossly inadequate

Uses "grossly" to denote a very large degree of inadequacy

are plainly insufficient

Emphasizes the obviousness of the insufficiency, using "plainly" instead of "substantially".

are severely deficient

Highlights the deficiency using "severely", indicating a critical lack.

are far from enough

Expresses the idea of insufficiency by stating that something is "far from enough".

do not suffice

Uses a more formal verb, "suffice", to express that something is not enough.

fall far short

Conveys the insufficiency by indicating that something "fall far short" of what is needed.

FAQs

How can I use "are substantially insufficient" in a sentence?

You can use "are substantially insufficient" to describe situations where something is significantly lacking or inadequate. For instance, "The resources allocated to the project "are substantially insufficient" to meet the deadlines".

What phrases can I use instead of "are substantially insufficient"?

Alternatives include "are significantly inadequate", "are markedly deficient", or "are considerably lacking", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "are substantially insufficient" or "are significantly insufficient"?

Both "substantially" and "significantly" work well, but "substantially" implies a more tangible or measurable deficiency. Using "are significantly insufficient" might be more appropriate when the deficiency is impactful but less easily quantified.

In what contexts is "are substantially insufficient" most appropriate?

"Are substantially insufficient" is particularly fitting in formal or technical contexts—such as reports or analyses—where you need to convey a significant and demonstrable lack of something. It might be less suitable for casual conversation.