are standards for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are standards for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing criteria or benchmarks that are established for a specific purpose or field. Example: "The guidelines provided are standards for evaluating the quality of research papers in this journal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

26 human-written examples

Beezinga, the Microsoft Imagine Cup finalist from Slovenia, has developed a system of sensors for standardized beehives (yes, there are standards for beehives).

TechCrunch

Technologists must also be certified, and there are standards for supervising physicians.

The New York Times - Health

Standards for evaluating trade shows' effectiveness are more available than are standards for assessing their efficiency.

Harvard Business Review

Dimensional and Geometric Product Specification and Verification (GPS) are standards for the description of the workpiece.

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Dimensional and Geometrical Product Specification and Verification (GPS) are standards for the description of workpieces.

Computer-Aided Design

"There are standards for records," Robert M. Hersh, a vice president of the I.A.A.F., said Monday night by telephone in defending the association's policies.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

34 human-written examples

These are standard for rooftop gun emplacement.

The New Yorker

These values are standard for most observations.

Harvard University

Other parameters are standard for the speed analysis.

Nature

Some of these requirements are standard for prominent speakers.

The Washington Post

Temperature checks and health questionnaires are standard for those entering buildings.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are standards for", ensure the context clearly defines what the standards are and what they apply to. Provide specific examples or references to the relevant benchmarks.

Common error

Avoid using "are standards for" without specifying the source or type of standards. Clearly indicate whether the standards are industry-specific, legal requirements, or internal guidelines.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are standards for" functions as a declarative statement introducing or referencing established guidelines, benchmarks, or criteria. It connects a subject with the specific standards applicable to it. Ludwig AI shows many examples across various fields where this construction is used to define rules or expectations.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

33%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are standards for" is a grammatically correct and commonly used construction to introduce established guidelines or criteria. Ludwig AI confirms its presence across diverse contexts like news, science, and academia. While versatile, clarity is key: specifying the nature and source of the standards avoids ambiguity. Alternatives such as "are criteria for" or "are specifications for" can provide a more precise nuance depending on the intended meaning. Using "are standards for" effectively involves clearly defining what constitutes the standard and its applicability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are criteria for

This alternative refers to the principles or standards by which something is judged or decided.

are measurements for

This alternative focuses on quantifiable metrics used as a basis for comparison, instead of general guidelines.

are specifications for

This emphasizes detailed requirements or precise criteria.

are tests for

This alternative specifies methods used to determine if something meets specified requirements or criteria.

are thresholds for

This highlights a minimum or maximum limit, acting as a standard to be reached or not exceeded.

are regulations for

This focuses specifically on legally binding rules or directives.

are indices for

This highlights measurable indicators that provide insight or benchmarks.

contain standards for

This suggests something that encompasses or includes established guidelines.

are policies for

This alternative refers to a set of principles or rules to guide decisions.

are rules for

This implies a set of explicit guidelines or principles governing conduct or procedure.

FAQs

How do I use "are standards for" in a sentence?

Use "are standards for" to introduce established guidelines or benchmarks. For example, "The guidelines provided "are standards for" evaluating research papers".

What are some alternatives to "are standards for"?

You can use alternatives like "are criteria for", "are specifications for", or "are regulations for" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is standards for" instead of "are standards for"?

No, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "are standards for" because "standards" is a plural noun, requiring the plural verb "are".

What's the difference between "are criteria for" and "are standards for"?

While similar, "are criteria for" typically refers to the specific principles used for evaluation, whereas "are standards for" can encompass a broader set of guidelines or benchmarks.