are similar for both

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are similar for both" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing two or more items, indicating that they share common characteristics or features. Example: "The results of the two experiments are similar for both methods used."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Science & Research

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The results are similar for both oak and fir.

Biomass and Bioenergy

Trends in the binding energy are similar for both periodic and molecular calculations.

Nature

The observed reaction enhancements are similar for both Pd/carbon and Pd/silica catalyst/cumene slurries.

Chemical Engineering Science

DNA closing rates are similar for both promoters and all RNAP variants.

Journal of Molecular Biology

TRAEs are characteristic of those associated with the use of chlorhexidine and are similar for both mouthrinses.

Nature

The average grain size and size distribution are similar for both textured and randomly oriented grains.

Acta Materialia

Pretreatment options are similar for both types of reverse osmosis and depend on the specific components of the water source.

Water Research

Some properties related to the component interactions, such as thermal degradation and moisture content, are similar for both composite systems.

Polymer

A high correlation would indicate that results are similar for both methods, and thus would support the soundness of full-information networks.

Nature

Filters, control and valve systems, injection systems, underground pipelines, and other components of drip irrigation systems are similar for both orchards and vineyards.

Developments in Agricultural Engineering

The numbers of surface irregularities between the unseeded AlloDerm® vs. developing EVPOME are similar for both histology and SAM 2-D B-scan images.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are similar for both", ensure that the comparison is clearly defined. Specify the attributes or characteristics that are similar to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are similar for both" when the items being compared only share superficial similarities. Ensure that the similarities are significant and relevant to the context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are similar for both" serves as a comparative descriptor, indicating that two distinct entities or categories share common characteristics or qualities. It is commonly used to highlight shared traits between two subjects, as confirmed by Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Science & Research

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are similar for both" is a grammatically correct and widely used comparative term, as verified by Ludwig AI. It indicates that two entities or categories share common characteristics. While versatile, its usage is most prevalent in scientific, academic, and news contexts. When writing, ensure that the comparison is well-defined to avoid ambiguity. The phrase is considered neutral in register, making it suitable for a variety of writing styles. Alternatives such as "are analogous for both" or "are comparable for both" can be used to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

display similarities for both

Highlights the presence of similarities, drawing attention to the common features they possess.

are comparable for both

Uses "comparable" instead of "similar", suggesting they can be evaluated against a common standard.

are alike for both

Employs a more informal synonym for "similar", suitable for less formal contexts.

are consistent for both

Focuses on the consistency of the attribute across both subjects, underlining a lack of significant difference.

are analogous for both

Replaces "similar" with "analogous", implying a more structural or functional resemblance.

share resemblances for both

Shifts the focus to the shared resemblances, highlighting specific similarities.

exhibit parallels for both

Replaces "similar" with "exhibit parallels", suggesting a mirrored or corresponding relationship.

show correspondence for both

Highlights the aspect of correspondence, indicating a direct relationship or match.

are uniform across both

Emphasizes the consistency or lack of variation between the two elements.

are related for both

Broadens the connection to a general relationship, which might not be immediately apparent without further explanation.

FAQs

How can I use "are similar for both" in a sentence?

Use "are similar for both" to indicate that two subjects or items share common characteristics or features. For example, "The symptoms of the two diseases "are similar for both" men and women."

What can I say instead of "are similar for both"?

You can use alternatives like "are analogous for both", "are comparable for both", or "are alike for both depending on the context.

Is it redundant to say "are similar for both"?

While not strictly redundant, "are similar for both" can sometimes be streamlined. Consider if "are similar" already implies the comparison between two entities. If the 'both' adds clarity, it's appropriate to keep it.

What is the difference between "are similar for both" and "are identical for both"?

"Are similar for both" indicates that the subjects share some common characteristics, while "are identical for both" implies that they are exactly the same in all aspects. Use "are similar" when there are minor differences.