are restricted for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are restricted for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct preposition should be "to" instead of "for." Example: "Access to the database is restricted to authorized personnel only."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It should be noted that GigaDB will only host data that can be released without restriction, and will not host data that are restricted for any reason, be that ethical or otherwise.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Choices are restricted for people across the world.

The Guardian - Opinion

Files concerning student records are restricted for 75 years.

Columbia University

All administrative records of the University are restricted for 25 years and all University Trustees' records are restricted for 50 years from the date of their creation.

Columbia University

Those voices will have to be loud and urgent, before our freedoms are restricted for good.

The Guardian - Opinion

All administrative records of the University are restricted for 25 years from the date of creation.

Columbia University

Membership lists in box 3 are restricted for 80 years from date of creation.

Cornell University

Student papers in Box 3 are restricted for 75 years from date of creation.

Columbia University

Some files are restricted for 75 years from their date of creation.

Columbia University

Student letters of recommendation are restricted for 75 years from their date of creation.

Columbia University

Records containing financial information are restricted for 25 years from date of creation.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for grammatical precision, substitute "are restricted for" with "are restricted to", "are limited to", or "are intended for".

Common error

Avoid using "for" after "restricted"; the correct preposition is typically "to". Use "Access is restricted to authorized personnel" instead of "Access is restricted for authorized personnel".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are restricted for" primarily functions as a passive verb phrase indicating a limitation or constraint. However, it's often considered grammatically incorrect as noted by Ludwig AI, the correct preposition should be "to" instead of "for."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

54%

News & Media

29%

Science

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are restricted for" appears in a variety of contexts, particularly in academic, news, and scientific sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The preferred construction is "are restricted to". Despite its common usage, aiming for grammatical precision and using alternatives such as "are limited to" or "are designated for" will improve clarity and accuracy in writing. Remember to adjust your preposition depending on the context, prioritizing "to" for grammatically sound sentences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are limited to

Changes the verb and preposition to indicate limitations instead of restrictions.

are confined to

Indicates that something is limited within specific boundaries or parameters.

are earmarked for

Specifically designates something for a particular purpose or recipient.

are designated for

Emphasizes that something has been officially assigned for a specific use.

are intended for

Focuses on the planned or expected use of something.

are exclusively for

Highlights that something is only available or applicable to a certain group.

are solely for

Similar to "exclusively for" but places more emphasis on the uniqueness of the limitation.

are reserved for

Suggests that something has been set aside for a specific purpose and is not generally available.

are allocated to

Indicates a formal assignment or distribution of something for a defined purpose.

are bound by

Shows that something is legally or contractually obligated by certain restrictions.

FAQs

What is the correct preposition to use with "are restricted"?

The correct preposition to use with "are restricted" is typically "to", as in "access "is restricted to" authorized personnel".

What can I say instead of "are restricted for"?

You can use alternatives such as "are limited to", "are confined to", or "are designated for" depending on the context.

Which is correct: "are restricted for" or "are restricted to"?

"Are restricted to" is the grammatically correct form. "Are restricted for" is generally considered incorrect in standard written English.

In what contexts might I use "are limited to" instead of "are restricted to"?

While both phrases convey a sense of limitation, "are limited to" often implies a practical or quantitative constraint, whereas "are restricted to" suggests a rule or regulation.