Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are reported in

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are reported in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing findings, data, or information that has been documented or published in a specific source. Example: "The results of the study are reported in the latest issue of the journal."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Details are reported in the journal Science.

News & Media

The Guardian

All are reported in gloriously mundane detail.

News & Media

Independent

Avian flu cases are reported in China.

Their findings are reported in Environmental Science and Technology.

Still, problems are reported in many sectors.

News & Media

The New York Times

Just three are reported in Arizona.

News & Media

The New York Times

Significant effects are reported in this article.

Carlson's results are reported in his book.

Results are reported in Supplementary Table S3.

Science & Research

Nature

The details are reported in Table 3.

Science & Research

Nature

These data are reported in Table 1.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are reported in", ensure the source you are referencing is credible and accessible to your audience. Be as specific as possible about where exactly the information can be found (e.g., specific table, section, or page).

Common error

Avoid vague statements like "the results are reported in the literature" without providing a specific citation. Always cite the specific source where the information is located to maintain academic integrity and allow readers to verify the information.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are reported in" serves as a connector, linking specific data, findings, or information to its source. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used. This passive construction emphasizes the location of the information rather than the actor reporting it. It guides the reader to where evidence or details can be verified, such as tables or specific documents.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are reported in" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves primarily to direct readers to the source of specific data or findings, ensuring transparency and verifiability. It's most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, maintaining a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, it's crucial to provide specific and credible sources to enhance the clarity and reliability of your writing. Alternatives like "are documented in" and "are detailed in" can be considered based on the specific nuance you want to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "are reported in" in a sentence?

The phrase "are reported in" is used to indicate where certain findings, data, or information can be found. For example, you might say, "The study's findings "are reported in" Table 3" or "These statistics "are reported in" the latest issue of the journal."

What are some alternatives to saying "are reported in"?

Alternatives to "are reported in" include phrases like "are documented in", "are detailed in", "can be found in", or "are presented in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "are reported in"?

While "are reported in" is in the passive voice, it's often appropriate when the source is more important than the actor. However, consider rewriting in the active voice if you want to emphasize who is reporting the information. For example, instead of "The results "are reported in" the journal", you could say "The researchers reported the results in the journal."

How does "are reported in" differ from "are described in"?

"Are reported in" typically refers to findings or data that have been formally documented or published. "Are described in", on the other hand, is a more general term that indicates something is explained or detailed in a particular source. The former implies a level of formality and verifiability, while the latter is more broadly descriptive.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: