Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are reported for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are reported for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasons or contexts in which something is reported, often in formal or academic writing. Example: "The results of the study are reported for their implications on public health policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Relative abundances are reported for each GSL.

Science & Research

Nature

Gaussian errors are reported for the counts and rates.

In most cases, two values are reported for quantitative analyses.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

Permeation results are reported for two different silicalite-1 membranes.

Results are reported for a 40% water volume fraction emulsion.

Some examples are reported for each of those applications.

Results are reported for both stationary and rotatiang disc electrodes.

Weld strength data are reported for three specimen thicknesses.

Science

Polymer

Algorithms are reported for each of the two convolution routes.

Reactor data are reported for ethene and ethyne hydrogenation reactions.

Obtained results are reported for three different experiments.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are reported for", ensure that the context clearly specifies what is being reported and the purpose or reason for the reporting. For example, "Results are reported for their implications on public health policy."

Common error

Avoid using "are reported for" without clearly indicating what data or findings are being reported and why. Ensure the subject and purpose are explicit to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are reported for" functions as a passive construction used to indicate the reason or purpose for which certain data, results, or information is being presented. It highlights the context or motivation behind the reporting, as supported by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

89%

News & Media

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are reported for" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression, particularly within scientific and academic domains. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is to convey the reason or context behind the presentation of data or findings. Usage is most common in scientific literature, while less frequent in informal contexts. To ensure clarity, it's best practice to specify exactly what is being reported and the purpose. Be mindful to maintain subject-verb agreement. Alternatives such as "are documented for" or "are noted for" may be used depending on the specific nuances. This phrase serves to provide contextual understanding, linking the reported information to its intended use or relevance.

FAQs

How can I use "are reported for" in a sentence?

Use "are reported for" to indicate the purpose or context in which data or results are presented. For example, "These findings "are reported for" their significance in understanding climate change".

What are some alternatives to "are reported for"?

Alternatives include "are documented for", "are noted for", or "are presented for", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "is reported for" instead of "are reported for"?

No, use "is reported for" with singular subjects and "are reported for" with plural subjects to maintain subject-verb agreement. For example, "The result is reported for its accuracy" versus "The results "are reported for" their reliability".

What's the difference between "are reported for" and "are reported on"?

"Are reported for" emphasizes the purpose or reason behind the reporting, while "are reported on" indicates the subject or topic being discussed. For instance, "Data are reported on climate change" focuses on the subject, whereas "Data "are reported for" policy implications" highlights the purpose.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: