are redundant

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are redundant" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is unnecessary or superfluous, often in the context of information or statements that repeat what has already been said. Example: "The additional details in the report are redundant and do not add any value to the overall analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Or they are redundant.

The New York Times - Arts

All core services are redundant.

Cornell University

Extra reeds and mouthpieces are "redundant supplies".

The New York Times

Several of the pieces are redundant.

The Economist

In parliamentary systems they are redundant.

The Guardian

Only some skinned grapes are redundant.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"Common and everyday are redundant," he said.

The New York Times

In these situations, controllers are redundant.

Embedded Systems Design using the Rabbit 3000 Microprocessor Interfacing, Networking and Application Development

Some jobs are being cut because they are redundant.

The New York Times

Why, you spoil us: the first two minutes are redundant.

The Guardian - Music

"'New Labour', Blairites, Brownites – all these labels are redundant.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When revising your writing, look for phrases that repeat information already stated; these "are redundant" and can be removed for clearer communication.

Common error

Avoid using multiple words or phrases that convey the same meaning in a sentence, as this creates unnecessary repetition and can make your writing seem verbose. For instance, instead of saying "completely finish", opt for "finish" as "completely" is often "redundant".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are redundant" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state of a noun or noun phrase as being superfluous or unnecessary. Ludwig AI confirms that this usage aligns with standard English grammar and is suitable for indicating that certain elements lack unique contribution.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are redundant" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to describe elements that are superfluous or unnecessary. Ludwig AI affirms its correct usage and broad applicability, particularly in formal writing across news, science, and academic contexts. When aiming for clarity and conciseness, consider alternatives like "are unnecessary" or "are superfluous", and always avoid unintentional repetition in your writing to maintain impact and precision. Always consider the writing guidelines to better use this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are unnecessary

Emphasizes the lack of necessity.

are superfluous

Highlights that something is beyond what's required.

are not required

States a lack of requirement.

serve no purpose

Focuses on the lack of utility.

are not needed

Indicates a lack of need.

are surplus to requirements

Formal way of saying there is more than what's needed.

are excess

Highlights that there is more than enough.

are unneeded

Similar to "are not needed" but more concise.

are dispensable

Indicates something can be done without.

are inessential

Emphasizes the lack of essential qualities.

FAQs

How can I use "are redundant" in a sentence?

You can use "are redundant" to describe elements that are unnecessary because they repeat or duplicate something already present. For example, "The extra details in the report "are redundant" and don't add value".

What phrases can I use instead of "are redundant"?

Alternatives include "are unnecessary", "are superfluous", or "are not required", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "is redundant" or "are redundant"?

Use "is redundant" for singular subjects and "are redundant" for plural subjects. For instance, "The extra information is redundant", and "The extra details "are redundant"".

What's the difference between "are redundant" and "are repetitive"?

"Are redundant" implies that something is unnecessary because it duplicates existing information, while "are repetitive" simply means something is repeated, whether necessary or not. Redundancy often implies inefficiency, whereas repetition is a neutral observation.