are practically missing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are practically missing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is almost absent or lacking in a particular context. Example: "The crucial details in the report are practically missing, making it difficult to draw any conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In contrast, audience-oriented reviews are practically missing; rather, imagined audiences tend to appear in the texts implicitly as similar to the reviewer, suggesting conceptions of a mass audience as well as specific groupings of general audiences.

Journal of Pragmatics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

In the Hassi R'mel field, a strong event on the surface seismic sections, between clayey Dogger and lagoonal Dogger tops, is suspected to be a multiple because it is practically missing on the outside VSP corridor stacks.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

In hau and gho mutant embryos, the basement membrane is practically missing, suggesting that a distinct population of COPII vesicles is charged with basal ECM formation.

Plosone

The results show that the relative numbers of missing genus-level assignations was below 80%% with Greengenes, irrespective of used 16S region or assignment algorithm, while with HITdb there were practically no missing assignments observed.

BMC Genomics

Miss and you are practically out, a failure.

The Guardian - Sport

Perhaps Schnur missed The Times' multi-part series last year on how Mexican farmworkers are practically enslaved.

Los Angeles Times

The current study misses so many important facets of testosterone replacement therapy that the results are practically meaningless.

Huffington Post

Rivers are practically nonexistent.

The New York Times - Travel

They are practically unusable.

The Guardian - Tech

General houseworkers are practically extinct.

The New Yorker

They are practically Kurdish royalty.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase in formal writing, consider whether a more precise term might be appropriate, depending on the context. For example, "negligible" or "scarce" may be more suitable in scientific or technical contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "are practically missing" when something is merely reduced or diminished. The phrase implies a near-complete absence, so ensure the context supports this level of severity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are practically missing" functions as a descriptive statement indicating that something is almost entirely absent or lacking. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English. Examples show its use in academic and journalistic contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are practically missing" is used to describe something that is almost entirely absent. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English, particularly for emphasizing a significant deficiency. While categorized as uncommon in frequency, it appears in reputable sources across both science and news, indicating its broad applicability. When using the phrase, ensure that the context genuinely supports the implication of near-complete absence to avoid overstatement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are almost absent

Emphasizes the near absence of something, changing "practically" to "almost" for a slight variation in degree.

are virtually nonexistent

Indicates that something has very little presence or impact, strengthening the sense of absence.

are nearly lacking

Focuses on the deficiency of something, using "lacking" instead of "missing".

are essentially absent

Highlights the fundamental absence of something, implying it's almost entirely gone.

are all but gone

Expresses that something is on the verge of disappearing completely, conveying a sense of near-total absence.

are hardly present

Suggests that something is barely there, emphasizing its limited presence.

are thinly available

Highlights that something is in limited distribution or supply.

are scarcely found

Emphasizes the rarity of something, indicating it's hard to come across.

are in short supply

Focuses on the limited availability of something, especially in relation to demand.

are notably deficient

Highlights a clear and recognizable lack or shortage of something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are practically missing"?

You can use alternatives like "are almost absent", "are virtually nonexistent", or "are nearly lacking" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "are practically missing" in formal writing?

Yes, "are practically missing" is generally acceptable in formal writing, especially when emphasizing a near-complete absence. However, consider whether a more precise term like "negligible" or "scarce" might be more suitable, depending on the context.

What's the difference between "are practically missing" and "are completely missing"?

"Are practically missing" implies a near absence, suggesting that something is almost entirely gone but perhaps a trace remains. "Are completely missing" indicates a total absence with nothing left.

How to use "are practically missing" in a sentence?

You can use "are practically missing" to describe a lack of something, as in "Audience-oriented reviews "are practically missing" in the texts" or "The crucial details in the report "are practically missing", making it difficult to draw any conclusions."