are points of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are points of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate specific aspects or elements of a broader topic or discussion. Example: "The following are points of consideration when evaluating the proposal: cost, feasibility, and impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

What is needed are points of comparison.

The Economist

"There are points of reset".

The Guardian - Music

(Wagner and Picasso are points of references).

The New York Times - Books

They are points of ardor in the cold world.

The New Yorker

There are points of division among us, of course.

The New York Times

But there are points of overlap between speech and material objects, don't you think?

The New York Times

There are points of resemblance to another Debussy work by Mr. Taylor, the 1977 "Images".

The New York Times - Arts

Syracuse's basketball team and its N.C.A.A. tournament record are points of pride for many students.

The New York Times

That is too glib: there are points of real difference in politics, as he knows.

The Economist

To those children and their families they truly are Points of Light".

Independent

The marathon is 26 miles long so, you know, there are points of vulnerability by definition.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are points of" when you want to specifically highlight individual items or aspects contributing to a larger topic or discussion. It adds clarity by segmenting complex subjects into manageable parts.

Common error

Avoid using "are points of" when simpler phrases like "include" or "consist of" would suffice. Overusing it can make your writing sound unnecessarily verbose or complex in straightforward situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are points of" primarily functions as a linking verb phrase introducing essential elements, aspects, or considerations related to a broader subject. Ludwig examples highlight this function across various contexts, denoting specific features or items.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

29%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are points of" serves as a grammatically sound and frequently employed construction to pinpoint and emphasize specific components or considerations within a larger context. As indicated by Ludwig, it's commonly found in news, scientific, and encyclopedic sources, reflecting a register that ranges from neutral to formal. While versatile, it's advisable to avoid its overuse in contexts where simpler phrasing suffices. Understanding its function and purpose allows for a more nuanced and effective application in writing and communication, ensuring clarity and emphasis where needed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

constitute elements of

Replaces "points" with "elements" and restructures the sentence to emphasize the compositional nature.

represent aspects of

Shifts from concrete "points" to more abstract "aspects", focusing on representation.

embody features of

Emphasizes the tangible embodiment of characteristics.

highlight facets of

Focuses on illuminating particular dimensions or angles.

denote characteristics of

Uses a more formal tone to signify identifying traits.

mark instances of

Highlights specific occurrences or examples within a broader scope.

serve as indicators of

Emphasizes the signal or symbolic role of the identified elements.

function as components of

Focuses on the operational role of each item within a larger system.

form the basis of

Suggests a foundational or essential role in creating something.

comprise key segments of

Highlights the importance of each portion in contributing to a complete whole.

FAQs

How can I use "are points of" in a sentence?

The phrase "are points of" is used to introduce specific elements or aspects that are part of a larger whole. For example, "Cost and feasibility "are points of" consideration when evaluating a proposal."

What are some alternatives to "are points of"?

You can use alternatives such as "constitute elements of", "represent aspects of", or "embody features of" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is points of" instead of "are points of"?

No, it is not correct. The correct form is "are points of" because "points" is plural, requiring the plural form of the verb "to be". Using "is" would be grammatically incorrect.

When is it best to use "are points of" over alternatives like "include" or "consist of"?

"Are points of" is most suitable when you want to emphasize that the listed items are specific facets or considerations within a broader scope. "Include" or "consist of" might be more appropriate for simple listings without such emphasis.