Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are omitted from
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are omitted from" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that has been intentionally left out or removed from a sentence, situation, or text. Example: The last two paragraphs of the article were omitted from the final print version due to space constraints. In this example, the sentence indicates that the last two paragraphs were intentionally left out or removed from the final print version of the article. This could be for various reasons such as word count limits or editing decisions. Another example: Some details were purposely omitted from the police report for confidentiality reasons. In this sentence, the phrase "were purposely omitted from" suggests that certain information was intentionally left out or removed from the police report. This could be done to protect the privacy of those involved in the incident.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Article titles are omitted from the reference list.
Science & Research
Objects that are not current are omitted from the list.
Academia
Whatever the reason, London and Winchester, then the country's capital, are omitted from Domesday.
News & Media
The three sketches appended in the original are omitted from this edition.
Academia
Grooves are applied on critical areas called high-stressed zones and are omitted from zones with low state of stresses.
As a guideline, Commentary allow up to 30 references and article titles are omitted from the reference list.
Science & Research
He lists some of the top issues that he believes are omitted from the discussion about Israel's war against Hamas.
News & Media
Domains omitted from these zone files are omitted from the author's data collection systems and from his subsequent analysis.
Academia
Even when words such as "excellence" and "success" are omitted from the title, they are often implicit.
News & Media
The apterygotes, which are regarded as survivors of primitive insect stock, are omitted from the family tree.
Encyclopedias
Several lesser items are omitted from the above list.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are omitted from", ensure the reason for omission is clear to the reader. This enhances clarity and avoids confusion.
Common error
Avoid using "are omitted from" without providing context or a reason for the omission. This can leave the reader wondering why the information is missing.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are omitted from" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that certain elements are being left out or excluded by an unspecified agent. It's commonly used to highlight what is not present in a particular context, as supported by Ludwig.
Frequent in
Science
61%
News & Media
19%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
3%
Wiki
3%
Formal & Business
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are omitted from" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction to indicate exclusion or absence of certain elements. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use across various contexts. As evidenced by numerous examples, it appears most commonly in scientific and news-related content, with a neutral to formal tone. When using this phrase, ensure that the reason for the omission is clear to maintain clarity and avoid confusion. While alternatives like "are excluded from" or "are left out of" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are excluded from
Indicates a more formal or deliberate exclusion.
are excluded from
Specifies a direct exclusion, often following a rule.
are left out of
Implies a less formal or intentional omission.
are removed from
Focuses on the act of taking something away or off.
are not included in
Emphasizes the absence of something from a set.
are absent from
Highlights the lack of presence in a given context.
are disregarded in
Suggests a purposeful overlooking or ignoring.
are dispensed with in
Implies that something is no longer necessary or relevant.
are overlooked in
Suggests a failure to notice or consider something.
are bypassed in
Implies that something is being avoided or skipped.
FAQs
How to use "are omitted from" in a sentence?
Use "are omitted from" to indicate that certain elements or details have been intentionally left out. For example, "Certain details "are omitted from" the report for confidentiality reasons."
What can I say instead of "are omitted from"?
You can use alternatives like "are excluded from", "are left out of", or "are not included in" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "are omitted from" or "were omitted from"?
Both "are omitted from" and "were omitted from" are grammatically correct; the choice depends on the tense. Use "are" for present tense and "were" for past tense.
What's the difference between "are omitted from" and "are excluded from"?
"Are omitted from" generally implies a broader or less formal exclusion, while "are excluded from" suggests a more deliberate or rule-based exclusion.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested