are often missing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are often missing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is frequently absent or lacking in a particular context. Example: "In many reports, crucial data points are often missing, which can lead to inaccurate conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Enclosures referred to in letters are often missing.

Princeton University

Despite this, systems biology approaches to model these pathways are often missing or not used.

Current Opinion in Microbiology

As you point out in the book, such descriptions are often missing from illness narratives.

The New Yorker

These courses are often missing in rural areas, which lack enough talented students and qualified teachers.

The New York Times

However, it is rarely related to the sediment supply of the watershed, because sediment yield data are often missing.

Science of The Total Environment

Marine spatial planning has been proposed as a way forward, however, social data are often missing impeding decision-making.

Journal of Environmental Management

Measurements that can be used for model validation, however, are often missing, especially for complex setups like airlift reactors.

Chemical Engineering Science

I appreciate the author's thoroughness and careful eye, two characteristics that are often missing in contemporary art criticism.

Harvard University

Many scientists suspect it is no coincidence that breast cancer cells are often missing autophagy-related genes.

The New York Times - Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

Even as new technologies proliferate, and more children are making and coding, Seymour's powerful ideas are often missing.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Books several hundred years old are often missing pages.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are often missing", ensure the subject is clearly defined and understood in the context. For example, instead of saying "Details are often missing", specify what details are missing and from where: "Crucial details are often missing from the reports."

Common error

Avoid using "are often missing" without specifying the context or subject clearly. Overgeneralizations can lead to ambiguity and weaken the statement. Instead of saying "Elements are often missing", specify which elements and under what circumstances: "Key elements are often missing in the initial project drafts".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are often missing" primarily functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating that certain elements or pieces of information are frequently absent. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase, as evidenced by numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are often missing" is a grammatically sound and versatile expression used to denote frequent absence across various contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, supported by numerous examples from diverse sources such as science, news media, and academia. Its primary function is to highlight deficiencies or gaps, and while its register is generally neutral, its specific implications can vary based on the subject matter. To enhance clarity, ensure that the subject is clearly defined and avoid overgeneralizations. Alternatives like "are frequently absent" can provide subtle shifts in emphasis. By understanding these nuances, writers can effectively employ "are often missing" to convey precise meanings in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are frequently absent

Replaces "often" with "frequently", emphasizing the regularity of absence.

are commonly lacking

Substitutes "missing" with "lacking", highlighting the deficiency.

are typically absent

Uses "typically" to indicate a usual absence.

are generally not present

Replaces "missing" with "not present", offering a more formal tone.

are usually unavailable

Emphasizes the lack of availability instead of absence.

are regularly omitted

Highlights the act of omission rather than simple absence.

are habitually excluded

Indicates a consistent pattern of exclusion.

are infrequently found

Focuses on the rarity of finding the items.

are seldom included

Highlights that the items are rarely included.

tend to be absent

Shifts the focus to a tendency rather than a state.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are often missing" to sound more formal?

You can use more formal alternatives like "are frequently absent" or "are typically unavailable" depending on the specific context.

What does "are often missing" imply in academic writing?

In academic writing, "are often missing" suggests a common deficiency or gap in research, data, or analysis. It points out that something is frequently absent, which may affect the validity or completeness of a study. For example, "Control groups "are often missing" in preliminary clinical trials".

How to use "are often missing" in a sentence?

Use "are often missing" to indicate that something is frequently absent or lacking in a particular context. For instance, "Critical safety features "are often missing" in low-budget products".

Which is the difference between ""are often missing"" and "are sometimes missing"?

"Are often missing" indicates a frequent occurrence, implying that the absence is common. "Are sometimes missing" suggests an occasional absence, implying it happens, but not frequently. Therefore ""are often missing"" is used when the absence is a pattern, while "are sometimes missing" is used when the absence is sporadic.