are oblivious to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are oblivious to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone is unaware of or does not notice something. Example: "Many people are oblivious to the impact their actions have on the environment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Washingtonians are oblivious to genetics.

The New Yorker

The Blundens are oblivious to this strife.

The New York Times - Books

"And second, they are oblivious to manipulation".

The New York Times

The Russians are oblivious to the human suffering there.

The New York Times

They are oblivious to real human emotions and passions.

The Guardian

They are oblivious to any evidence to the contrary.

The Guardian - Opinion

Particles of light – photons – are oblivious to it.

The Guardian

Not that suburbs like Westchester are oblivious to bicyclists.

The New York Times

Apparently, these three overseers are oblivious to the Brandeis mission".

The New York Times - Arts

And many newer surfers are oblivious to surfing etiquette.

The New York Times - Magazine

On the one hand, there are the technicians who are oblivious to values.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are oblivious to" to describe situations where someone is genuinely unaware or unconcerned about something important. For example, "Many people are oblivious to the environmental impact of their daily choices."

Common error

Avoid using "are oblivious to" when you actually mean someone is deliberately ignoring something. Obliviousness implies a lack of awareness, whereas indifference suggests a conscious choice to not care.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are oblivious to" functions as a predicate adjective phrase. It describes the subject by indicating a state of unawareness or lack of perception. Ludwig's examples show it modifying various subjects, from "Washingtonians" to "particles of light", illustrating its broad applicability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Science

7%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are oblivious to" is a versatile and commonly used expression that signifies a lack of awareness or understanding. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and appropriateness in various contexts. It's often found in news and media sources, used to describe individuals or groups unaware of critical information or situations. Remember to use it when genuine unawareness is meant, rather than deliberate indifference, and consider more formal alternatives like "are unaware of" or "are ignorant of" depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are unaware of

Direct synonym, indicating a lack of knowledge or consciousness.

are ignorant of

Suggests a lack of knowledge, often implying a lack of education or intelligence.

are unconscious of

Implies a lack of awareness, often in a more passive or unintentional way.

are insensitive to

Highlights a lack of emotional or empathetic awareness.

are heedless of

Indicates a disregard or inattention to something, often implying a warning or risk.

are blind to

Emphasizes a complete lack of perception or understanding, often metaphorically.

are unmindful of

Suggests a lack of consideration or thoughtfulness.

are taking no notice of

Emphasizes the act of not paying attention to something.

are disregarding

To treat as unworthy of regard or attention

are overlooking

To fail to notice

FAQs

How can I use "are oblivious to" in a sentence?

You can use "are oblivious to" to indicate a lack of awareness or understanding. For example: "Many consumers "are oblivious to" the complex supply chains behind their products."

What's a more formal alternative to "are oblivious to"?

More formal alternatives include "are unaware of" or "are ignorant of", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "are oblivious of" instead of "are oblivious to"?

While "oblivious" can technically be followed by "of", "are oblivious to" is the more common and accepted usage in modern English.

What's the difference between "are insensitive to" and "are oblivious to"?

"Are insensitive to" implies a lack of emotional awareness or empathy, while "are oblivious to" suggests a general lack of awareness or knowledge about something. They are similar but not perfectly interchangeable.