are not systematic

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not systematic" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing something that lacks a structured or organized approach. Example: "The results of the study are not systematic, which makes it difficult to draw reliable conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

So far the new inspections are not systematic enough to yield measurable results.

The New York Times

The mean ss-sl offset and standard deviations in all archives are not systematic, and closely cluster around zero.

Nature

Most changes due to amplification are not systematic both within one tumor sample and between different tumors.

Stanford University

Yet too often, local authorities are not systematic in identifying family members who could look after a child who is unable to remain at home.

The Guardian

The Abhidhamma texts are not systematic philosophical treatises but a detailed scholastic reworking, according to schematic classifications, of doctrinal material appearing in the Suttas.

Britannica

Mr. Seymour, the spokesman for the D.M.V., said he couldn't comment on specific cases; he said counter clerks of the department do make occasional mistakes, but the mistakes are not systematic.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

It is NOT systematic theology.

Yale University

The first answer is not systematic.

The New York Times

A registrar position is not systematic.

Progrès en Urologie

But it was not systematic, organised or endemic.

The Guardian

However, he added: "Torture is not systematic, it's only committed by a few people".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not systematic", ensure the context clearly indicates what aspect lacks a systematic approach. Be specific to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are not systematic" as a generic criticism. Instead, specify why something lacks a system and what the consequences are.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not systematic" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the subject's lack of a structured or organized approach. Ludwig AI confirms this with numerous examples across various domains.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

32%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are not systematic" effectively conveys the absence of a structured or organized approach. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically sound and commonly used in various contexts, particularly in scientific, academic, and news-related domains. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what lacks a system and what the implications are. Consider alternatives like "are unsystematic" or "lack a system" depending on the desired level of emphasis and conciseness. By understanding its function, purpose, and potential pitfalls, you can effectively incorporate "are not systematic" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lack a system

More concise way of expressing the absence of a systematic approach.

are unsystematic

Direct synonym using the prefix "un-" to negate "systematic".

are not methodical

Replaces "systematic" with "methodical", implying a lack of a specific procedure.

are not structured

Focuses on the absence of a clear structure or arrangement.

are disorganized

Highlights the lack of organization or arrangement.

are not standardized

Emphasizes the absence of a consistent standard or protocol.

are inconsistent

Highlights the lack of consistency or uniformity.

are erratic

Suggests unpredictable and irregular behavior or patterns.

are haphazard

Implies a lack of planning or care, resulting in randomness.

are random

Suggests a complete lack of pattern or predictability.

FAQs

How can I use "are not systematic" in a sentence?

You can use "are not systematic" to describe processes, methods, or approaches that lack a defined structure or organization. For instance, "The data collection methods "are not systematic", leading to inconsistent results."

What are some alternatives to saying "are not systematic"?

Alternatives include "lack a system", "are unsystematic", "are not methodical", or "are disorganized", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "are not systematic" or "are unsystematic"?

Both "are not systematic" and "are unsystematic" are grammatically correct. "Are unsystematic" is more concise, while "are not systematic" might provide slightly more emphasis. The choice depends on the desired tone and style.

When is it appropriate to use "are not systematic" in writing?

Use "are not systematic" when you need to clearly convey that a process or method lacks a structured or organized approach. Ensure the context provides sufficient detail about what specifically lacks a system.