Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are not regulated
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are not regulated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is not subject to rules or laws governing it. Example: "Many online platforms are not regulated, which raises concerns about user safety and data privacy."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
They are not regulated".
News & Media
"The banks are not regulated.
News & Media
Coding camps are not regulated or accredited.
News & Media
They are not regulated by the insurance industry.
News & Media
The remaining 650,000 units are not regulated.
News & Media
These are not utilities, because they are not regulated.
News & Media
"They are not regulated for a mass consumer market.
News & Media
In some states they are not regulated at all.
News & Media
Crucially, however, they are not regulated as insurance policies.
News & Media
Other charities are not regulated by the Charity Commission.
News & Media
However, independent wellness vendors are not regulated by HIPAA.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "are not regulated", be specific about what is not regulated and by whom. For example, instead of saying "Supplements are not regulated", specify "Supplements are not regulated by the FDA".
Common error
Avoid using "are not regulated" in a way that implies a complete absence of any oversight. Often, even if something isn't regulated by a specific body, there may be other forms of informal control or self-regulation. For instance, saying "The internet is not regulated" is misleading, as various laws and industry standards do apply, even if it's not under a single, comprehensive regulatory framework.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are not regulated" functions as a predicate adjective, describing the state of a noun or subject as being free from regulatory oversight. Ludwig shows numerous examples where this phrase clarifies that certain entities, activities, or products lack formal rules or laws governing them.
Frequent in
News & Media
75%
Science
15%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Academia
1%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are not regulated" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe something lacking formal oversight. As Ludwig highlights, it's frequently used in news and media to inform about the absence of rules or laws, especially in contexts like finance, health, and technology. It's crucial to be specific about what is not regulated and by whom to avoid overgeneralizations. While alternatives like ""are unregulated"" or ""are not governed"" exist, the best choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis. Ludwig AI confirms the usability of this phrase and provides several examples that showcase its versatile application.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are unregulated
A more concise and direct way of saying "are not regulated", using the prefix 'un-' to negate the verb.
are uncontrolled
Similar to "are not regulated", but emphasizes the lack of control rather than formal rules.
are not governed
Focuses on the absence of governance or a governing body, which can be broader than regulation.
fall outside the regulatory framework
A more formal and specific way to indicate that something is not subject to existing regulations.
are exempt from regulation
Highlights that something has been specifically excluded from regulation.
lack oversight
Emphasizes the absence of supervision or monitoring.
are not subject to rules
A more general way to express the absence of rules or guidelines.
are outside the scope of regulation
Similar to 'fall outside the regulatory framework', indicating something is not covered by regulations.
operate without regulation
Focuses on the activity or process happening in the absence of regulation.
are not standardized
Indicates a lack of uniform standards, implying a lack of regulatory control.
FAQs
How can I use "are not regulated" in a sentence?
You can use "are not regulated" to indicate that something is not subject to specific rules or laws. For example, "Hedge funds "are not regulated" in the same way as banks".
What's a synonym for "are not regulated"?
Alternatives include "are unregulated", "are uncontrolled", or "are not governed", depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "are not regulated"?
Yes, "are not regulated" is grammatically correct and widely used to describe something that lacks formal oversight or control.
What's the difference between "are not regulated" and "are self-regulated"?
"Are not regulated" implies an absence of external rules or laws, while "are self-regulated" means that the entity follows its own internal rules or standards.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested