are not provided

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not provided" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something is not provided or given to someone. It can be used in a variety of contexts, such as when discussing the lack of something in a situation or agreement. Example: The instructions clearly state that snacks are not provided on the tour, so be sure to bring your own.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Specific addresses are not provided.

The New York Times

(Heat and phone service are not provided).

The New Yorker

Soap and shampoo are not provided.

The New York Times - Travel

"Social amenities are not provided, the government is not here.

The Guardian

Unfortunately, the dates for each model are not provided.

The New York Times

In addition, shipping and tax costs are not provided.

The New York Times - Tech

In cases where benefits are not provided, the minimum wage rises to $10.25.

The New York Times

But these songs are not provided to you on a compact disk.

The New Yorker

Detainees are not provided with lawyers, and many families are not informed of their whereabouts.

The New Yorker

Neural correlations are not provided to back these up – nor are they necessary.

The Guardian - Books

But child care is unlikely to help teenagers if good after-school activities are not provided.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not provided", ensure that the context clearly specifies what is lacking and to whom or what it is not being provided. This enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are not provided" when a stronger verb like 'lacks' or 'excludes' would more accurately convey the intended meaning. Overuse can weaken the impact of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not provided" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something is missing or not supplied. It is a versatile phrase used to describe deficiencies in services, resources, or information. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

31%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not provided" is a common and grammatically sound way to express the absence of something. Ludwig AI supports this, confirming its usability across various contexts. Predominantly found in Science, News & Media, and Formal & Business publications, this phrase serves to inform or explain the absence of specific services, resources, or information. While versatile, it's crucial to ensure the context clarifies what exactly "is not provided" to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "are not supplied" or "are not furnished" may offer a nuanced fit depending on the specific meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are not supplied

Emphasizes the absence of a supply or resource.

are not furnished

Implies a lack of equipment or necessary items.

are not given

Highlights the act of withholding or not granting something.

are not offered

Focuses on the absence of an opportunity or option.

are not available

Indicates a general lack of accessibility.

are not included

Suggests that something is deliberately excluded.

are not equipped

Implies a lack of necessary tools or preparation.

are absent

States that something is missing or not present.

are missing

Indicates that something has been lost or is not where it should be.

do not exist

Denotes the complete absence or non-existence of something.

FAQs

How can I use "are not provided" in a sentence?

You can use "are not provided" to indicate that something is missing or not supplied, for example: "Meals "are not provided" during the conference, so plan accordingly."

What are some alternatives to "are not provided"?

Alternatives include "are not supplied", "are not furnished", or "are not available", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "are not provided" or "are not giving"?

"Are not provided" is a passive construction emphasizing the lack of provision, while "are not giving" implies an active withholding. The choice depends on whether you want to focus on the state of being unsupplied or the act of not giving.

What is the difference between "are not provided" and "are not included"?

"Are not provided" generally means something is not supplied as a matter of course. "Are not included" suggests a deliberate exclusion. For example, "Drinks "are not provided"" versus "Drinks "are not included" in the price."