are not incompatible

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not incompatible" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that two or more things can coexist or work together without conflict. Example: "The new policy and the existing regulations are not incompatible, allowing for a smoother implementation process."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"These are not incompatible.

The Guardian - Business

These goals are not incompatible.

The New York Times - Sports

The two are not incompatible".

The Guardian

But they are not incompatible.

The New York Times - Arts

Those two freedoms are not incompatible".

The New York Times

These strains of liberalism are not incompatible.

The New York Times

The two theories are not incompatible.

The Washington Post

Human rights and political pragmatism are not incompatible.

The New York Times

These are not incompatible things," the shadow chancellor says.

The Guardian

The worlds of the two photographers are not incompatible.

The Guardian

The two concepts are not incompatible -- remember the Checker?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not incompatible", ensure that the context clearly establishes the potential for conflict or opposition that you are then dispelling.

Common error

Avoid using "are not incompatible" to connect completely unrelated ideas. This phrase works best when addressing a perceived conflict or tension between the concepts you're discussing. For example, saying "Cats and quantum physics are not incompatible" is nonsensical unless you're addressing a specific argument that they are.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not incompatible" functions as a predicate adjective expressing that two or more concepts, actions, or entities can coexist or even complement each other. It is used to reconcile seemingly opposing ideas, as demonstrated by Ludwig in the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

28%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Academia

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not incompatible" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for indicating that two or more things can coexist harmoniously. Ludwig's analysis confirms that this phrase is appropriate for dispelling potential conflicts and is suitable for various contexts, as demonstrated by the examples found in news, science and encyclopedias. When writing, use this phrase to convey the idea that seemingly contradictory ideas or actions can, in fact, work together. Keep in mind that directly replacing "are not incompatible" with "are compatible" is a strong option.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are compatible

Replaces the negative construction with a positive affirmation of compatibility.

do not conflict

Indicates an absence of opposition or contradiction between two or more things.

can coexist

Emphasizes the ability of two or more things to exist together in the same time or space.

are consistent

Highlights the harmony or agreement between different elements.

are not mutually exclusive

Stresses that choosing one option does not necessitate rejecting the other.

are harmonious

Suggests a pleasing or congruent combination of elements.

work together

Focuses on the collaborative aspect of two or more things.

are in accordance

Implies a state of agreement or conformity.

do not contradict

Highlights the absence of logical inconsistency.

are reconcilable

Suggests that seemingly opposing ideas can be brought into agreement.

FAQs

How can I use "are not incompatible" in a sentence?

You can use "are not incompatible" to show that two seemingly opposing ideas or actions can coexist or even be complementary. For example, "Prioritizing employee well-being and achieving high productivity "are not incompatible"".

What phrases can I use instead of "are not incompatible"?

Alternatives to "are not incompatible" include phrases like "are compatible", "can coexist", or "are consistent", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "are not incompatible with each other"?

While grammatically correct, adding "with each other" to "are not incompatible" can be redundant. The phrase already implies a relationship between two or more things. Saying "They "are not incompatible"" is usually sufficient.

What is the difference between "are not incompatible" and "are complementary"?

"Are not incompatible" suggests that two things can coexist without conflict, while "are complementary" implies that they enhance or improve each other. Complementary ideas work well together, whereas incompatible ideas cannot.