Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are not included because of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not included because of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to explain the reason why certain items or elements are excluded from a list or group. Example: "The following items are not included because of budget constraints: new equipment and additional staff."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

Incomes are not included because of secrecy laws.

News & Media

The New York Times

A few ZIP codes are not included because of insufficient data.

News & Media

The New York Times

The 1920s teams are not included because of drastic differences in the game and the league.

News & Media

The New York Times

The 1920s teams are not included because of severe differences in the game and the league.

News & Media

The New York Times

The 1920s teams are not included, because of severe differences in the game and league.

News & Media

The New York Times

"It is very important that the media make clear that those missing the bowl trip are not included because of either injury or for a violation of team policy," the associate athletic director Rob Wilson said Saturday in a statement accompanying the travel list.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Even if devices aren't included because of age or condition, Apple will still help customers recycle old hardware.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Mason Mount and James Maddison were not included because of injury.

New York and Florida were not included because of problems with their data.

News & Media

The New York Times

Ten states were not included because of incomplete data.

Scottish cities and Belfast were not included because of a lack of available data.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not included because of", ensure the reason provided is clear and directly relevant to the exclusion. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using overly general or unclear reasons after "are not included because of". Be specific about the cause of exclusion to prevent confusion. Instead of saying "are not included because of issues", specify "are not included because of data inconsistency".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not included because of" functions as a causal connector, explaining the reason for an exclusion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to provide a rationale for why something is not part of a set or list.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Wiki

3%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not included because of" is a grammatically correct causal connector used to explain why something is excluded. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's a common way to provide a reason for an omission. While versatile, ensuring the reason is clear and direct enhances its effectiveness. Common alternatives include "are excluded due to" and "are omitted because of". Be specific about the cause of exclusion to prevent ambiguity.

FAQs

What does "are not included because of" mean?

The phrase "are not included because of" indicates that certain items or elements have been deliberately left out or excluded from a group or list, and it provides the reason for this exclusion. It's a causal connector explaining why something is absent.

How can I use "are not included because of" in a sentence?

You can use "are not included because of" to explain why specific items are excluded. For example: "These files "are not included because of" their large size".

What can I say instead of "are not included because of"?

You can use alternatives like "are excluded due to", "are omitted because of", or "are left out due to" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "due to" or "because of"?

Both "due to" and "because of" are acceptable, but "because of" is generally considered more versatile and can be used in a wider range of contexts. "Due to" often follows a linking verb, while "because of" can be used more broadly.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: