Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are not included because of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are not included because of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to explain the reason why certain items or elements are excluded from a list or group. Example: "The following items are not included because of budget constraints: new equipment and additional staff."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
11 human-written examples
Incomes are not included because of secrecy laws.
News & Media
A few ZIP codes are not included because of insufficient data.
News & Media
The 1920s teams are not included because of drastic differences in the game and the league.
News & Media
The 1920s teams are not included because of severe differences in the game and the league.
News & Media
The 1920s teams are not included, because of severe differences in the game and league.
News & Media
"It is very important that the media make clear that those missing the bowl trip are not included because of either injury or for a violation of team policy," the associate athletic director Rob Wilson said Saturday in a statement accompanying the travel list.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
49 human-written examples
Even if devices aren't included because of age or condition, Apple will still help customers recycle old hardware.
News & Media
Mason Mount and James Maddison were not included because of injury.
News & Media
New York and Florida were not included because of problems with their data.
News & Media
Ten states were not included because of incomplete data.
News & Media
Scottish cities and Belfast were not included because of a lack of available data.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are not included because of", ensure the reason provided is clear and directly relevant to the exclusion. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using overly general or unclear reasons after "are not included because of". Be specific about the cause of exclusion to prevent confusion. Instead of saying "are not included because of issues", specify "are not included because of data inconsistency".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are not included because of" functions as a causal connector, explaining the reason for an exclusion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to provide a rationale for why something is not part of a set or list.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
40%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Academia
3%
Wiki
3%
Reference
4%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "are not included because of" is a grammatically correct causal connector used to explain why something is excluded. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's a common way to provide a reason for an omission. While versatile, ensuring the reason is clear and direct enhances its effectiveness. Common alternatives include "are excluded due to" and "are omitted because of". Be specific about the cause of exclusion to prevent ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are excluded due to
Formal alternative emphasizing the act of exclusion and the cause.
are omitted because of
Highlights the act of leaving something out, similar in formality.
are left out due to
More informal, focusing on the act of omission.
are not considered due to
Emphasizes a lack of consideration as the reason for exclusion.
are precluded by
A more formal and stronger assertion of prevention.
are not factored in because of
Highlights the absence of influence or impact due to a reason.
are disregarded on account of
Emphasizes a decision to ignore something based on a specific reason.
are not taken into account because of
Focuses on the lack of consideration for something in a calculation or assessment.
are bypassed due to
Indicates that something was skipped or avoided because of a reason.
aren't part of it given
Informal expression emphasizing that they are not related with the rest.
FAQs
What does "are not included because of" mean?
The phrase "are not included because of" indicates that certain items or elements have been deliberately left out or excluded from a group or list, and it provides the reason for this exclusion. It's a causal connector explaining why something is absent.
How can I use "are not included because of" in a sentence?
You can use "are not included because of" to explain why specific items are excluded. For example: "These files "are not included because of" their large size".
What can I say instead of "are not included because of"?
You can use alternatives like "are excluded due to", "are omitted because of", or "are left out due to" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "due to" or "because of"?
Both "due to" and "because of" are acceptable, but "because of" is generally considered more versatile and can be used in a wider range of contexts. "Due to" often follows a linking verb, while "because of" can be used more broadly.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested