are not identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing items, individuals, or concepts that have not been recognized or named in a particular context. Example: "The sources of the data are not identified in the report, making it difficult to assess its reliability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Bnodes represent resources that are not identified by a uniform resource identifier (URI) or literals.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

You are not identified".

The New York Times

(Patients are not identified in the survey).

The New York Times - Arts

Those agencies are not identified in the public version of the report, which was censored.

The New York Times

In some cases the locations of the photographs are not identified.

The New York Times

Globally 2.4 billion people are not identified on official government documents.

The Guardian

Peterson Littenberg's plans are not identified as such in the Federal Hall exhibition.

The New York Times

You are not identified with the designer clothing you are wearing or not wearing.

The New York Times

The individuals are not identified, but are understood to include Graham Norton and Gary Lineker.

The Guardian

The exact coördinates of the massacres are not identified, Ryan explained.

The New Yorker

The table and the man are not identified, and neither is the sender.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not identified", ensure the context clearly indicates what is doing the identifying and what criteria are used for identification. This adds precision and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While "are not identified" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make writing seem vague or less direct. Consider if using an active voice construction would be more effective and engaging. For example, instead of "the errors are not identified", try "the system fails to identify the errors".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not identified" primarily functions as a passive verb construction. It indicates that a subject is not being recognized or specified. As Ludwig AI notes, it's a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

45%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are not identified" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction, as confirmed by Ludwig. It serves to indicate a lack of recognition or specification, commonly found in scientific and news contexts. While versatile, it's important to consider the potential overuse of the passive voice and ensure clear context. Alternatives like "remain unrecognised" or "cannot be identified" may offer more nuanced expressions. Usage should be carefully considered to maintain clarity and avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

remain unrecognised

Emphasizes the ongoing state of not being recognized, highlighting a lack of current identification.

are not recognised

Focuses on the lack of official acknowledgement or acceptance, rather than just identification.

cannot be identified

Highlights the inability to identify something, suggesting a limitation or impossibility.

are not specified

Emphasizes the absence of specific details or a clear designation.

are not designated

Focuses on the lack of an official designation or assignment.

are not labelled

Highlights the absence of a label or identifier, focusing on the act of naming.

are unclassified

Emphasizes the lack of classification or categorization.

are not catalogued

Focuses on the absence of inclusion in a catalogue or list.

go unacknowledged

Shifts the focus to the lack of acknowledgment or recognition, suggesting a possible oversight.

are undocumented

Highlights the absence of documentation or records.

FAQs

How can I use "are not identified" in a sentence?

Use "are not identified" to indicate that certain items or entities lack recognition or specification within a given context. For example, "The causes of the disease "are not identified" in the current study".

What are some alternatives to "are not identified"?

You can use alternatives such as "remain unrecognised", "cannot be identified", or "are not specified" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "are not identified" or "remain unidentified"?

Both "are not identified" and "remain unidentified" are grammatically correct. "Are not identified" is more formal and passive, while "remain unidentified" is slightly more active. The best choice depends on the desired tone and context.

What does "are not identified" mean in the context of research?

In research, "are not identified" often means that specific variables, factors, or individuals are not specified or distinguished within the study's methodology or findings, often to protect privacy or because the data is unavailable.