are not given

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not given" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used when someone is talking about something that is not given or provided. Example: "The instructions for the assignment are not given clearly, making it difficult for students to understand what is expected of them."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are not given a summons.

The New York Times

Letter grades are not given.

Stanford University

Individual amounts are not given.

The New York Times

"Civil rights are not given.

The New York Times

Some courses are not given every year.

Stanford University

They are not given the appropriate respect".

The New York Times

But they are not given cash.

The Guardian

But they are not given to children.

The Guardian

They are not given antibiotics or hormones.

The New York Times - Food

Bags are not given out for free.

The Guardian

Bits are not given explicit ''addresses" in memory.

Stanford University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are not given" to express that something is withheld or not provided, emphasizing the passive nature of the action. For instance, "Details about the experiment are not given to ensure unbiased results."

Common error

Avoid using "are not given" when an active voice construction is more appropriate and direct. For example, instead of "Explanations are not given by the instructor", consider "The instructor does not provide explanations".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not given" functions primarily as a passive voice construction, indicating that something is withheld or not provided. This is validated by Ludwig, which identifies its grammatical correctness and widespread use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Academia

28%

Science

24%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are not given" is a common and grammatically correct passive voice construction used to indicate that something is not provided or withheld. As confirmed by Ludwig, it appears frequently across diverse contexts, from news and media to academic and scientific writing. While versatile, it's essential to ensure that the passive voice is the most effective choice, avoiding it when an active voice construction would be clearer and more direct. When rephrasing, alternatives like ""are not provided"" or "are not granted" can offer subtle differences in meaning. Pay attention to subject-verb agreement, using "are" with plural subjects and "is" with singular subjects.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are not provided

Focuses on the act of supplying something, similar to giving.

are not supplied

Highlights the lack of a resource being made available.

are not granted

Emphasizes the absence of permission or authorization.

are not offered

Focuses on the absence of an opportunity or proposal.

are not allocated

Highlights the lack of assignment or distribution.

are not furnished

Similar to providing, but often used for physical items or information.

are not dispensed

Suggests a controlled or regulated distribution is absent.

are not issued

Implies an official or formal process of granting which is not happening.

are not awarded

Focuses on the lack of recognition or bestowal of something.

are not presented

Highlights the absence of something being shown or introduced.

FAQs

How can I rephrase the sentence "Details are not given"?

Alternatives include "Details "are omitted"", "Details "are withheld"", or "Details "are not provided"", depending on the intended nuance.

What does it mean when information "is not given"?

It indicates that the information is intentionally or unintentionally left out, making it unavailable to the recipient. The phrase "are not given" implies that the action of providing the information is absent.

Is there a difference between saying "are not given" and "aren't given"?

"Aren't given" is a contracted form of "are not given". Both are grammatically correct and have the same meaning. The choice between them often depends on the desired level of formality, with "are not given" being slightly more formal.

Which is more formal, "are not given" or "is not given"?

The form "are not given" is used with plural subjects, while "is not given" is used with singular subjects. The level of formality is similar; the choice depends on subject-verb agreement. For example, "Instructions are not given" versus "An instruction "is not given"".