are not extensive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not extensive" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is limited in scope or size. Example: "The resources available for this project are not extensive, so we need to prioritize our tasks carefully."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

Asian resources of nickel are not extensive.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The province's mineral resources are not extensive.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"These are not extensive e-mails," Mr. Oldman explained with a laugh.

The New York Times

The edits are not extensive; they mostly consist of language alterations and brief cuts of specific scenes.

The New York Times - Arts

Dining options are not extensive, but a handful of newish openings have raised the bar for beer, coffee and gastronomy.

The Guardian - Travel

"My investments are not extensive," Mr. Callaghan said in an interview, adding that he spent his money on "groceries, the mortgage".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

24 human-written examples

It's not extensive.

The New York Times - Sports

Her renovations were not extensive.

The New York Times

My routine is not extensive.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

To be sure, Godse's appeal is not extensive.

Independent

The menu is not extensive, but a number of dishes shine.

The New York Times - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not extensive", ensure the context clearly identifies what is being described as limited. For example, "The available data are not extensive, so further research is needed."

Common error

Avoid using "are not extensive" when the subject is completely absent or non-existent. Use phrases like "are absent" or "do not exist" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not extensive" functions as a descriptive phrase, typically modifying a noun to indicate that something is limited in scope, size, or degree. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

37%

Encyclopedias

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not extensive" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used to denote limitations in scope, amount, or degree. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in scientific, news, and encyclopedic contexts, it conveys a sense of something being less than comprehensive or abundant. When using this phrase, ensure clarity about the subject being limited and avoid using it when something is entirely absent. Consider alternatives like "are limited" or "are minimal" for nuanced variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are limited

Emphasizes the restricted quantity or scope.

are not comprehensive

Focuses on the lack of thoroughness or completeness.

are minimal

Highlights the small size or degree.

are scarce

Stresses the rarity or insufficiency.

are restricted

Indicates constraints or limitations imposed.

are not exhaustive

Similar to "are not comprehensive", suggesting incompleteness.

are in short supply

Highlights the limited availability of something.

are wanting

Implies a deficiency or lack.

are negligible

Emphasizes insignificance or unimportance.

are underdeveloped

Suggests a lack of growth or advancement.

FAQs

How can I use "are not extensive" in a sentence?

The phrase "are not extensive" is used to describe something that is limited in scope, amount, or degree. For instance, "The available resources "are not extensive", which poses a challenge to our project."

What can I say instead of "are not extensive"?

You can use alternatives like "are limited", "are minimal", or "are scarce" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "are not extensive" or "are limited"?

Both "are not extensive" and "are limited" are grammatically correct and can often be used interchangeably. However, "are not extensive" might suggest a more nuanced degree of limitation than "are limited", focusing on scope or comprehensiveness rather than sheer quantity.

What's the difference between "are not extensive" and "are not comprehensive"?

"Are not extensive" implies a limitation in size, scope, or amount, while "are not comprehensive" suggests a lack of thoroughness or completeness. For example, "The research data are not extensive" means there isn't much data, whereas "The research findings are not comprehensive" means the findings don't cover all aspects of the topic.