are not entitled

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not entitled" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone does not have a right or claim to something. Example: "Employees are not entitled to take vacation days without prior approval from their manager."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(Immigration detainees are not entitled to lawyers)..

The New Yorker

"They are not entitled to it".

The New York Times - Sports

(Immigration detainees are not entitled to lawyers).

The New Yorker

They are not entitled to more.

Cornell University

People who are old and/or sick are not "entitled".

The New Yorker

He says we are not entitled to equal human rights.

Independent

"They are not entitled to a nuclear weapons program".

The New York Times

"Economic refugees," of course, are not entitled to asylum.

The Guardian

"Journalists are not entitled to promise complete confidentiality.

The Guardian

As a result they are not entitled to damages.

The Guardian

Exempt University employees are not entitled to receive overtime pay.

Stanford University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not entitled", ensure that the reason for the lack of entitlement is clear to avoid ambiguity. Specify the source or basis of the entitlement being denied.

Common error

Avoid using "are not entitled" without providing context. Instead of saying "People are not entitled", specify "People are not entitled to free healthcare if they are not citizens."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not entitled" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, denying a right, claim, or privilege. Ludwig AI confirms its wide applicability across various contexts. It asserts a lack of legitimate expectation or eligibility.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Academia

19%

Science

12%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are not entitled" is a versatile expression used to indicate a lack of right, claim, or privilege. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across various contexts, including News & Media, Academia, and Science. While seemingly straightforward, careful consideration should be given to the context in which it is used. Alternatives such as "have no right to" or "are not authorized" can provide nuanced variations. As highlighted in the writing guidance, clarity is crucial when using "are not entitled"; always ensure the reason for the lack of entitlement is apparent. Ludwig's examples showcase its wide applicability, from legal limitations to social expectations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have no right to

Emphasizes the absence of a legal or moral claim.

have no claim to

Highlights the lack of a valid demand or assertion.

are not authorized

Focuses on the lack of official permission or sanction.

are not permitted

Highlights the lack of allowance or consent.

are not eligible

Indicates a failure to meet the necessary requirements.

are not privileged

Emphasizes the absence of a special right or advantage.

are not qualified

Stresses the absence of the required skills or attributes.

are not sanctioned

Implies a lack of approval or endorsement.

are not due

Indicates that something is not owed or payable.

are not warranted

Suggests that something is not justified or deserved.

FAQs

How can I use "are not entitled" in a sentence?

You can use "are not entitled" to indicate that someone does not have a right or claim to something. For example, "Immigration detainees "are not entitled" to lawyers."

What's a formal alternative to "are not entitled"?

In formal contexts, you might use phrases like "do not have the right to", or "are not authorized" as alternatives to "are not entitled".

Which is correct, "are not entitled to" or "is not entitled to"?

"Are not entitled to" is used with plural subjects, while "is not entitled to" is used with singular subjects. For example, "They "are not entitled" to a new trial" versus "He is not entitled to special treatment."

What's the difference between "are not entitled" and "are not allowed"?

"Are not entitled" implies a lack of a right or claim, while "are not allowed" implies a lack of permission. "Are not allowed" focuses on prohibition, while "are not entitled" focuses on the absence of a legitimate expectation.