are not deep

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not deep" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that lacks depth, whether literally (like water) or metaphorically (like a conversation or thought). Example: "The discussions we had during the meeting are not deep enough to address the core issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

"These are not deep connections.

The New York Times

"Our differences are not deep".

The New York Times

They are not deep thinkers.

The Guardian

Their roots are not deep, their reality one of mingled blood.

The New York Times

While some changes in behaviour are taking place, these are not deep or broad enough.

The Guardian - Business

But since their pockets are not deep enough, the honor will fall to all of us.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

Data from alternative models suggest that many plumes are not deep-rooted.

Britannica

The strings are not deep-pile and sonorous, but refined and pliant; the brass is neither butch nor aggressive, but projects a purposeful directness; the woodwind is perfectly detailed.

The Guardian - Music

We are not deep-value managers.

Forbes

That doesn't mean there are not deeper realities to experience and cognize.

Communicative and Integrative Biology

The Blue Devils aren't deep.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not deep" to describe abstract concepts, ensure the context clearly indicates what aspect lacks depth (e.g., "The analysis is not deep enough to reveal the underlying causes").

Common error

Avoid using "are not deep" excessively in formal or academic writing. Opt for more precise and sophisticated synonyms like "lack depth", "are superficial", or "are not thorough" to enhance clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not deep" functions as a predicate adjective, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate a lack of depth. It is commonly used to express that something lacks complexity, thoroughness, or profound meaning. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's usability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Science

21%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are not deep" is a versatile expression used to indicate a lack of depth, whether literal or figurative. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across various contexts. While suitable for general communication, more formal or scientific settings may benefit from synonyms like "lack depth" or "are superficial". Its primary function is to provide a negative assessment, highlighting what is missing or insufficient. The prevalence of "are not deep" in News & Media underscores its role in everyday language.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lack depth

This alternative uses a more concise verb phrase to convey the absence of depth.

are superficial

This phrase emphasizes the surface-level nature of something, lacking thoroughness or insight.

are not profound

This directly substitutes 'deep' with its synonym 'profound', maintaining a similar tone.

are shallow

This is a more common and direct synonym for 'not deep', often used in informal contexts.

do not delve deeply

This alternative highlights the absence of thorough investigation or exploration.

are not complex

Focuses on the lack of intricacy or complication.

are not intricate

Similar to 'are not complex' but emphasizes a lack of detailed or elaborate structure.

are simplistic

This suggests an oversimplified nature, lacking nuance or sophistication.

lack substance

Highlights the absence of meaningful content or importance.

are not thorough

Focuses on the lack of completeness or attention to detail.

FAQs

What does it mean when something "is not deep"?

When something "is not deep", it means it lacks complexity, thoroughness, or profoundness. It can apply to discussions, analyses, or even physical spaces, indicating a lack of significant content or dimension.

How can I use "are not deep" in a sentence?

You can use "are not deep" to describe various situations. For example, "The wounds "were not deep"", or "Their connections "are not deep", they matter over time".

What can I say instead of "are not deep"?

You can use alternatives like "lack depth", "are superficial", or "are not profound" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "are not deep" in writing?

"Are not deep" is suitable for both informal and neutral contexts. In formal writing, it may be better to use a more sophisticated synonym like lack depth or "are not thorough".