are not covered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are not covered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is excluded or not included in a particular context, such as a policy or agreement. Example: "Certain expenses, such as travel and accommodation, are not covered by the company policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Imports are not covered.

The New York Times

And occupational pension schemes are not covered.

The Economist

(Departure delays are not covered).

The New York Times - Travel

Lenders are not covered by the corporation.

The New York Times

Other milk products are not covered.

The Guardian - Business

Loans are not covered by the corporation.

The New York Times

Debentures are not covered by the FSCS.

The Guardian - Money

Meanwhile, whole continents are not covered.

The New York Times - Arts

The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

The Guardian

Those are not covered by the agreement with Mr. Cuomo.

The New York Times

Disney says those items are not covered by the license.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are not covered", ensure the context clearly specifies what is providing the coverage (e.g., insurance policy, agreement, law).

Common error

Avoid using "are not covered" without clearly defining what the covering entity is. For example, instead of saying "These items are not covered", specify "These items are not covered by the warranty".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are not covered" functions as a declarative statement indicating that something is excluded or not included within a specific scope, such as an insurance policy, agreement, or legal provision. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature, supported by numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are not covered" is a versatile and commonly used phrase that clearly indicates exclusion or lack of inclusion within a specific context. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and appears frequently in "News & Media", "Science", and "Formal & Business" contexts. When writing, ensure that you specify what the covering entity is to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "are excluded" or "are not included" can be used for stylistic variation. By following these guidelines, you can effectively and accurately use "are not covered" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are excluded

Indicates a more direct and forceful removal or omission.

are not included

A more neutral way of saying something is absent from a list or group.

are exempt

Specifically denotes freedom from a rule or obligation.

are outside the scope

Highlights that something falls beyond the defined boundaries of a topic or project.

are not subject to

Indicates that something is not affected by a particular rule or process.

do not fall under

Emphasizes that something is not classified within a specific category or system.

are not applicable

Suggests that something is irrelevant or unsuitable in a given situation.

are not valid

Implies that something lacks legal or official force.

are unprotected

Indicates a lack of safeguarding or security.

are unaddressed

Shows that specific topics or problems have been not resolved or discussed.

FAQs

How can I use "are not covered" in a sentence?

You can use "are not covered" to indicate that something is excluded from a particular policy, agreement, or law. For example, "Pre-existing conditions "are not covered" by this insurance policy."

What's a more formal alternative to "are not covered"?

In a more formal context, you can use phrases such as "are excluded" or "are not included" to convey a similar meaning.

When is it appropriate to use "are not covered"?

"Are not covered" is appropriate when you need to clearly state that something is not included within the scope of a specific provision or agreement.

What is the difference between "are not covered" and "are not protected"?

"Are not covered" typically refers to contractual or policy-based exclusions, while "are not protected" indicates a lack of safeguarding or security. The choice depends on whether you're referring to an agreement or a security measure.