are manually revised

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are manually revised" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where something is reviewed and edited by a person rather than automatically or by a machine. Example: "The documents are manually revised to ensure accuracy before final approval."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In silico methods have been shown to have a high predictive value (88.1%) when four different methods are in agreement [Chan et al., 2007] and alignments are manually revised [Tavtigian et al., 2008a].

Human Mutation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

After each experiment, ECG traces were manually revised to ensure that the R-waves had been correctly detected by the in-built algorithm.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Even so, AZPort 's categorization was manually revised by one human annotator so as to correct potential errors and hence minimize the chances of any noise from the automatic annotation interfering with the coherence annotation.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

Since rule based systems for specific domains require their knowledge sources to be manually revised when ported to other domains, we enrich our rule based recognizer and turn it into a hybrid recognizer so that it learns from annotated data when available and improves its knowledge sources accordingly.

Expert Systems with Applications

The list of membrane protein genes thus created was manually revised to exclude proteins localized in intracellular compartments (false positives) and to include additional membrane-associated proteins known from literature (false negatives).

Plosone

Pseudogenes for all genomes were manually revised.

Genome Biology and Evolution

These contigs were manually revised to detect possible errors.

BMC Genomics

These contigs were manually revised to detect possible errors all along the bioinformatics process.

BMC Veterinary Research

The automatic annotation performed by Blast2GO was manually revised to guarantee accurate assignment.

BMC Plant Biology

These lists were manually revised and contain approximately 1900 terms for H.sapiens.

Bioinformatics

All annotations leading to the concepts in Table 5 were manually revised, and only two cases were erroneous (rows 3 and 10).

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a quality control process, specify the criteria used during manual revision to ensure clarity and replicability. For instance, mention the specific guidelines or standards followed by the human reviewers.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on manual revision without implementing preliminary automated checks. Automated tools can identify common errors more efficiently, allowing manual reviewers to focus on complex or nuanced issues. This combined approach enhances accuracy and saves time.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are manually revised" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that a subject is being acted upon through a process of human review and modification. Ludwig AI supports this based on provided examples where data, categorizations, annotations, and lists undergo this process.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are manually revised" is grammatically sound and primarily used in formal contexts, particularly within scientific and technical domains. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its function as a passive verb phrase, emphasizing human intervention in refining data or processes. While its usage isn't very frequent, understanding when and how to use it correctly is essential for precision in technical writing. When using this phrase, ensure you're highlighting the deliberate and thorough nature of human review to enhance credibility and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are revised by hand

Emphasizes the physical act of revision being done by a person.

are edited manually

Focuses on the editing aspect, implying a more detailed level of modification.

are human-reviewed

Highlights the involvement of a human in the review process.

are checked manually

Implies a verification process done by a person.

are manually inspected

Focuses on a detailed visual examination by a person.

are corrected by hand

Highlights the manual aspect of fixing errors.

are manually adjusted

Emphasizes the fine-tuning aspect of the revision.

are manually modified

Focuses on changes made by a person.

are reviewed and revised by a person

Explicitly states the involvement of a person in both review and revision.

undergo manual revision

A more formal way of saying something is revised manually.

FAQs

How can I use "are manually revised" in a sentence?

You can use "are manually revised" to describe a process where something is reviewed and edited by a person, such as "The documents "are manually revised" to ensure accuracy."

What's the difference between "are manually revised" and "are automatically revised"?

"Are manually revised" implies human intervention and judgment, while "are automatically revised" suggests a process completed by software or a machine without human oversight.

What can I say instead of "are manually revised"?

You can use alternatives like "are revised by hand", "are edited manually", or "are human-reviewed" depending on the context.

In what contexts is "are manually revised" most appropriate?

"Are manually revised" is particularly appropriate in technical or scientific contexts where precision and nuanced judgment are required, like ensuring data accuracy or correcting errors in complex systems.