are less valuable for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are less valuable for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the comparative worth or importance of something in relation to a specific purpose or context. Example: "These resources are less valuable for long-term investments compared to more stable options."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Unfortunately, because of the alcoholic's past behaviour toward his or her family, old relationships often are less valuable for relapse prevention than new ones.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The benefits vary: BOGOF or three-for-the-price-of-two deals are less valuable for perishable foods than for tinned goods.

The Economist

Or perhaps all this amped-up degree-getting just represents job market "signaling" — the economist A. Michael Spence's Nobel-worthy notion that degrees are less valuable for what you learn than for broadcasting your go-get-'em qualities.

The New York Times

Or perhaps all this amped-up degree-getting just represents job market "signaling" -- the economist A. Michael Spence's Nobel-worthy notion that degrees are less valuable for what you learn than for broadcasting your go-get-'em qualities.

The New York Times

Overall, chimpanzees without extensive cognitive training do barter foods which are less valuable for those which are more valuable.

Plosone

Group mean data are important for understanding that a drug is clearly superior to placebo, but are less valuable for informing patients of expected responses.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

The establishment of SRC on grassland is less valuable for the protection of resources and the environment than on arable land.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

This is because in this case, the transmission scheduling is limited to the amount of available energy which can be used for transmission, and knowledge about the future CSI in the offline algorithm is less valuable for a transmission scheduling purpose.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Indeed, for the most part, AIs that are self-aware and have their own opinions would seem to be less valuable for companies to develop.

Huffington Post

Therefore, the AS-PCR method is less valuable for molecular diagnosis of kdr resistance in Cx. pipiens pallens.

Plosone

De-identified reports will probably be less valuable for research compared to fully identified reports.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are less valuable for", clearly specify the context or purpose for which something is less valuable. This provides clarity and prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "are less valuable for" without indicating the specific area where the value is diminished. Saying something is simply "less valuable" can be vague and confusing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are less valuable for" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate a diminished value or importance in relation to a specific purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

37%

Formal & Business

26%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are less valuable for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that something has reduced worth or importance in a specific context. Ludwig AI confirms that its usage is correct and acceptable. While the phrase appears mostly in scientific and news sources, its neutral register makes it appropriate for a range of contexts. When using this phrase, be sure to specify the context in which the subject is less valuable to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "are not as useful for" or "are not as important for" may be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are not as useful for

Replaces "valuable" with "useful", focusing on the diminished utility or benefit.

are not as beneficial for

Substitutes "valuable" with "beneficial", emphasizing the reduced advantages or positive outcomes.

are not as important for

Replaces "valuable" with "important", highlighting the diminished significance or relevance.

are not as significant for

Substitutes "valuable" with "significant", emphasizing the reduced impact or consequence.

are of less worth for

Rephrases using "worth" instead of "valuable", focusing on the diminished monetary or inherent value.

have limited utility for

Replaces "are less valuable" with "have limited utility", focusing on the restricted usefulness.

are not particularly effective for

Substitutes "valuable" with "effective", highlighting the reduced capability to produce the desired result.

are ill-suited for

Indicates a poor match or incompatibility for a particular purpose, implying reduced value.

are less advantageous for

Replaces "valuable" with "advantageous", highlighting the diminished positive aspects or gains.

are not ideal for

Suggests that the subject is not the best choice or solution, implying a lower value in that context.

FAQs

What does "are less valuable for" mean?

The phrase "are less valuable for" indicates that something has a reduced worth, benefit, or importance in relation to a specific purpose or context. It suggests a comparative assessment of value.

How can I use "are less valuable for" in a sentence?

You can use "are less valuable for" to compare the usefulness of different options. For example, "These skills "are less valuable for" remote work compared to in-person collaboration."

What can I say instead of "are less valuable for"?

You can use alternatives like "are not as useful for", "are not as beneficial for", or "are not as important for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "are less valuable for" or "is less valuable for"?

"Are less valuable for" is used with plural subjects, while "is less valuable for" is used with singular subjects. For example, "These tools "are less valuable for" this task" versus "This tool "is less valuable for" this task".