are less interesting for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are less interesting for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the comparative level of interest regarding a particular subject or audience. Example: "Many people believe that documentaries are less interesting for younger viewers compared to action films."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

To Louboutin, shoes are less interesting for their physical properties than for their psychological ones.

The New Yorker

But several of the objects are less interesting for their beauty than as documents of what must have been a fairly grim reality.

The New York Times

They are less interesting for their skillful neo-Expressionist-meets-fashion-illustration style than for their effective physical eccentricities, especially the rendering process — energetic free-form embroidery of long stitches both dense and spidery.

The New York Times - Arts

They also often apply for relatively small loans, which are less interesting for banks, since the same largely similar fixed costs are attached to the provision of a small loan as to larger loans.

IZA Journal of Migration

The SULFA dataset was also extended by the REWIND dataset [16]; anyway, these datasets are less interesting for video source identification, since they contain few digital cameras only and no smartphone, while we know smartphones are the most representative kind of device today, especially for applications on social media platforms.

EURASIP Journal on Information Security

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

This poll is less interesting for what it shows about foreign aid than for what it shows about American democracy.

The New Yorker

This messy, longwinded volume — which is less interesting for its tidbits of news than for its overall picture of a presidency — leaves us with an intimate portrait of the commander in chief hanging out with an old pal, occasionally posing for history, but more often using Mr. Branch as a late-night sounding board and stenographer.

The New York Times - Books

Made on a shoestring budget and starring an array of above-the-title actors, "Rage" (the title truncates "all the rage," a phrase no one in fashion is likely to have uttered since the 1920s) may ultimately be less interesting for its cast than for its formal conceits and its distribution plan.

The New York Times

The movie -- whose roster of musical talent includes, beyond Beyoncé, Shirley Caesar, Montell Jordan and the O'Jays -- is less interesting for what it says about the struggle between the secular and the sanctified than for what it demonstrates about the contemporary state of that struggle.

The New York Times

That's less interesting for me as a VC.

TechCrunch

Providing details of Saadya's arguments for creation ex nihilo is less interesting for our current purposes than making some observations about Saadya's sensibilities about reason and revelation in these discussions.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are less interesting for", clearly specify the subject and the target audience or purpose for which it is less interesting to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid stating that something "are less interesting for" without providing a specific comparison or reason. Vague statements can weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are less interesting for" serves as a comparative adjective phrase. It indicates that something possesses a lower degree of appeal or relevance in comparison to something else, particularly concerning a specific group or purpose. As indicated by Ludwig AI, it is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are less interesting for" is a grammatically correct comparative phrase used to express diminished appeal or relevance. Ludwig AI validates its usability in written English. It's most commonly found in neutral contexts like news and science, indicating a reduced level of appeal for a particular audience or purpose. When employing this phrase, ensure clear context and comparison to avoid overgeneralization. Alternatives such as "are not as captivating for" or "are less relevant to" can provide nuanced variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are not as captivating for

Replaces "interesting" with "captivating", emphasizing a decrease in the ability to hold attention.

are not as engaging for

Uses "engaging" instead of "interesting", highlighting a decreased ability to involve or attract.

are not as appealing to

Substitutes "interesting for" with "appealing to", focusing on a reduction in attractiveness or desirability.

are less attractive to

Focuses on attractiveness, suggesting a reduced appeal or allure.

are less relevant to

Replaces "interesting for" with "relevant to", emphasizing a reduced connection or applicability.

lack appeal for

Directly states the absence of appeal, indicating a lack of attractiveness or interest.

hold less significance for

Changes the focus from interest to significance, suggesting a decrease in importance or relevance.

are of diminished value to

Shifts the perspective to value, indicating a decrease in usefulness or worth.

are of secondary importance to

Emphasizes secondary status, suggesting a lower level of relevance or significance.

are not a priority for

Shifts the focus to prioritization, indicating a lower level of importance or concern.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are less interesting for" to sound more formal?

You can use more formal alternatives such as "hold less significance for", "are of diminished value to", or "are less relevant to" to maintain a professional tone.

What is a more engaging way to say "are less interesting for"?

Consider using alternatives like "are not as captivating for", "are not as appealing to", or "are not as engaging for" to create a stronger impact.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "are less interesting for"?

This phrase is suitable when comparing the level of interest something holds for different audiences or purposes. For example, "Documentaries "are less interesting for" some viewers than fictional films".

Are there situations where "are not interesting" is better than "are less interesting for"?

Use "are not interesting" when something lacks interest in general. Use ""are less interesting for"" when comparing interest levels across different groups or purposes.